Penalized Least Squares methods for solving the EEG Inverse Problem

Most of the known solutions (linear and nonlinear) of the ill-posed EEG Inverse Problem can be interpreted as the estimated coefficients in a penalized regression framework. In this work we present a general formulation of this problem as a Multiple Penalized Least Squares model, which encompasses many of the previously known methods as particular cases (e.g., Minimum Norm, LORETA). New types of inverse solutions arise since recent advances in the field of penalized regression have made it possible to deal with non-convex penalty functions, which provide sparse solutions (Fan and Li (2001)). Moreover, a generalization of this approach allows the use of any combination of penalties based on l1 or l2-norms, leading to solutions with combined properties such as smoothness and sparsity. Synthetic data is used to explore the benefits of non-convex penalty functions (e.g., LASSO, SCAD and LASSO Fusion) and mixtures (e.g., Elastic Net and LASSO Fused) by comparing them with known solutions in terms of localization error, blurring and visibility. Real data is used to show that a mixture model (Elastic Net) allows for tuning the spatial resolution of the solution to range from very concentrated to very blurred sources.

[1]  L. Galán,et al.  Random Field–Union Intersection tests for EEG/MEG imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Grave de Peralta Menendez,et al.  A LINEAR INVERSE SOLUTION WITH OPTIMAL RESOLUTION PROPERTIES : WROP . , 2004 .

[4]  Erick Jorge Canales-Rodríguez,et al.  Granger Causality on Spatial Manifolds: Applications to Neuroimaging , 2006 .

[5]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter , 1979, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[6]  D. Hunter,et al.  Variable Selection using MM Algorithms. , 2005, Annals of statistics.

[7]  A. E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems , 2000 .

[8]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[9]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[10]  J Townsend,et al.  Visual attention abnormalities in autism: Delayed orienting to location , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[11]  H. Kiiveri A Bayesian approach to variable selection when the number of variables is very large , 2003 .

[12]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[13]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[14]  D. Hunter,et al.  A Tutorial on MM Algorithms , 2004 .

[15]  R. Pascual-Marqui Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem , 1999 .

[16]  C. Michel,et al.  Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. II. Demonstration of Sublobar Accuracy in Patients with Simultaneous Surface and Depth Recordings , 2004, Brain Topography.

[17]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[18]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso , 2005 .

[21]  G. Backus,et al.  Numerical Applications of a Formalism for Geophysical Inverse Problems , 1967 .

[22]  Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto,et al.  Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. Scherg,et al.  Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using FOCUSS: a re-weighted minimum norm algorithm , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[25]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[26]  B. Scholz,et al.  Probability-based current dipole localization from biomagnetic fields , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  C. Michel,et al.  Noninvasive Localization of Electromagnetic Epileptic Activity. I. Method Descriptions and Simulations , 2004, Brain Topography.

[28]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[29]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Controlled Support MEG imaging , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  J. Riera,et al.  Electric lead field for a piecewise homogeneous volume conductor model of the head , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): a review. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[32]  M. Fuchs,et al.  Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[33]  J. Hadamard,et al.  Lectures on Cauchy's Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations , 1924 .

[34]  R. Grave de Peralta Menendez,et al.  Basic limitations of linear inverse solutions: a case study , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[35]  N. Trujillo-Barreto,et al.  3D Statistical Parametric Mapping of EEG Source Spectra by Means of Variable Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (VARETA) , 2001, Clinical EEG.

[36]  Tohru Ozaki,et al.  Recursive penalized least squares solution for dynamical inverse problems of EEG generation , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[37]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[38]  Brani Vidakovic,et al.  Wavelet-Based Nonparametric Bayes Methods , 1998 .

[39]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties , 2001 .

[40]  P. Valdés-Sosa,et al.  Variable Resolution Electric-Magnetic Tomography , 2000 .

[41]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.