Quantification of tumor changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with longitudinal breast DCE-MRI registration

Imaging plays a central role in the evaluation of breast tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Image-based assessment of tumor change via deformable registration is a powerful, quantitative method potentially to explore novel information of tumor heterogeneity, structure, function, and treatment response. In this study, we continued a previous pilot study to further validate the feasibility of an open source deformable registration algorithm DRAMMS developed within our group as a means to analyze spatio-temporal tumor changes for a set of 14 patients with DCE-MR imaging. Two experienced breast imaging radiologists marked landmarks according to their anatomical meaning on image sets acquired before and during chemotherapy. Yet, chemotherapy remarkably changed the anatomical structure of both tumor and normal breast tissue, leading to significant discrepancies between both raters for landmarks in certain areas. Therefore, we proposed a novel method to grade the manually denoted landmarks into different challenge levels based on the inter-rater agreement, where a high level indicates significant discrepancies and considerable amounts of anatomical structure changes, which would indeed impose giant problem for the following registration algorithm. It is interesting to observe that DRAMMS performed in a similar manner as the human raters: landmark errors increased as inter-rater differences rose. Among all selected six deformable registration algorithms, DRAMMS achieves the highest overall accuracy, which is around 5.5 mm, while the average difference between human raters is 3 mm. Moreover, DRAMMS performed consistently well within both tumor and normal tissue regions. Lastly, we comprehensively tuned the fundamental parameters of DRAMMS to better understand DRAMMS to guide similar works in the future. Overall, we further validated that DRAMMS is a powerful registration tool to accurately quantify tumor changes and potentially predict early tumor response to chemotherapy. Therefore, future studies that aim at examining if DRAMMS can generate valuable biomarkers for tumor response prediction during chemotherapy become feasible.

[1]  Chengjun Liu,et al.  Gabor feature based classification using the enhanced fisher linear discriminant model for face recognition , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  João Manuel R S Tavares,et al.  Medical image registration: a review , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[3]  Xia Li,et al.  Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity in DCE- and DW-MRI Parametric Maps to Optimize Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[4]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[5]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Parametric Response , 2015 .

[6]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Rémy Guillevin,et al.  Response assessment in recurrent glioblastoma treated with irinotecan-bevacizumab: comparative analysis of the Macdonald, RECIST, RANO, and RECIST + F criteria. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[8]  C. Jaffe Measures of response: RECIST, WHO, and new alternatives. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Daniele Regge,et al.  Monitoring Response to Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  Brian D Ross,et al.  Predicting and monitoring cancer treatment response with diffusion‐weighted MRI , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  The parametric response map is an imaging biomarker for early cancer treatment outcome , 2009, Nature Medicine.

[12]  L. Esserman,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. , 2012, Radiology.

[13]  E. Conant,et al.  Deformable registration for quantifying longitudinal tumor changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Julie A. Margenthaler,et al.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated with Improved Survival Compared with Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Only after Complete Pathologic Response , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[15]  Christos Hatzis,et al.  Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[17]  Tom Vercauteren,et al.  Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[18]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  Parametric response map as an imaging biomarker to distinguish progression from pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Ryan Chamberlain,et al.  Image registration for quantitative parametric response mapping of cancer treatment response. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[21]  David A. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative measures of FDG PET after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to predict breast cancer patient survival. , 2012 .

[22]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  DRAMMS: Deformable Registration via Attribute Matching and Mutual-Saliency Weighting , 2009, IPMI.

[23]  Fredrik Mattsson,et al.  Tumor stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines survival after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.