Balancing solar PV deployment and RD&D: A comprehensive framework for managing innovation uncertainty in electricity technology investment planning

We present a new framework for studying the socially optimal level of generating capacity and public RD&D investments for the electric power sector under decision-dependent technical change uncertainty. We construct a bottom-up stochastic electricity generation capacity expansion model with uncertain endogenous RD&D-based technical change, focusing on solar PV RD&D investment planning for its current prominent role in sustainable energy and climate policy deliberations. We characterize the decision-dependent process of technical change uncertainty as unknown outcomes of RD&D investments that increase the likelihood of success with increasing amounts of RD&D, and calibrate to a novel expert elicitation dataset that accounts for this decision-dependence. The problem is framed as a multi-stage decision under uncertainty, where the decision maker learns and adapts to new information between decision periods. Specifically, our application considers four decision stages, with the decision-maker choosing investment levels for new capacity and solar PV RD&D, while learning about RD&D outcomes that can reduce solar PV costs between each stage. The problem is thus formulated to match the manner in which real-world decisions about RD&D investments in renewable energy are made, and avoids common assumptions of perfect foresight, or uncertainty but no learning, that are often used in practice. Numerical results show that when uncertainty and learning features are both included, the optimal solar PV RD&D investment strategy changes from solutions using other methods. Considering uncertainty and learning results in solar RD&D investment differences as high as 20 percent lower in the first-stage, and 300 percent higher in later stages. We also show that when uncertainty is considered without learning, the fraction of new solar PV capacity investments can be depressed. Overall, this paper shows that it is possible to unify several realistic features of the deployment and development problem for the electricity sector to meet sustainability goals into one framework.

[1]  Mort Webster,et al.  The Curious Role of “ Learning ” in Climate Policy : Should We Wait for More Data ? , 2000 .

[2]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  Uncertain R&D, Backstop Technology and Ghgs Stabilization , 2007 .

[3]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Electric sector investments under technological and policy-related uncertainties: a stochastic programming approach , 2013, Climatic Change.

[4]  Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  Wholesale marginal prices in competitive generation markets , 1997 .

[5]  Panos Parpas,et al.  An approximate dynamic programming framework for modeling global climate policy under decision-dependent uncertainty , 2012, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[6]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Induced Technical Change in Energy and Environmental Modeling: Analytic Approaches and Policy Implications , 2002 .

[7]  Laura Diaz Anadon,et al.  The price of wind power in China during its expansion: Technology adoption, learning-by-doing, economies of scale, and manufacturing localization , 2012 .

[8]  S. Messner,et al.  A stochastic version of the dynamic linear programming model MESSAGE III , 1996 .

[9]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[10]  Laura Diaz Anadon,et al.  Expert elicitation of cost, performance, and RD&D budgets for coal power with CCS , 2011 .

[11]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Neuro-Dynamic Programming , 1996, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[12]  Richard G. Richels,et al.  A decision analysis of the U.S. breeder reactor program , 1978 .

[13]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[14]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching , 2000 .

[15]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Endogenizing R&D and Market Experience in the "Bottom-Up" Energy-Systems ERIS Model , 2004 .

[16]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Flexibility in Engineering Design , 2011 .

[17]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  “Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality” by Warren B. Powell , 2007, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[18]  David Popp,et al.  THEY DON'T INVENT THEM LIKE THEY USED TO: AN EXAMINATION OF ENERGY PATENT CITATIONS OVER TIME , 2005 .

[19]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Approximate Dynamic Programming - Solving the Curses of Dimensionality , 2007 .

[20]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  A Model of Endogenous Technological Change Through Uncertain Returns on Learning (R&D and Investments) , 1997 .

[21]  Geoffrey J. Blanford,et al.  R&D investment strategy for climate change , 2009 .

[22]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Expert assessments of future photovoltaic technologies. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  R. Bellman Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[24]  Jeffrey M. Keisler,et al.  Cellulosic biofuels: Expert views on prospects for advancement , 2011 .

[25]  Antonio Nieto,et al.  The real option value of mining operations using mean-reverting commodity prices , 2015 .

[26]  M. Slade Valuing Managerial Flexibility: An Application of Real-Option Theory to Mining Investments , 2001 .

[27]  David Popp,et al.  Entice: Endogenous Technological Change in the Dice Model of Global Warming , 2003 .

[28]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  The Future Prospect of PV and CSP Solar Technologies: An Expert Elicitation Survey , 2012 .

[29]  R. Richels,et al.  The Value of Technological Advance in Decarbonizing the U.S. Economy , 2007 .

[30]  Lester B Lave,et al.  Baseload coal investment decisions under uncertain carbon legislation. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Mort Webster,et al.  Technology Variation vs. R&D Uncertainty: What Matters Most for Energy Patent Success? , 2012 .

[32]  David Popp,et al.  Induced Innovation and Energy Prices , 2001 .

[33]  Erin Baker,et al.  Demand Subsidies Versus R&D: Comparing the Uncertain Impacts of Policy on a Pre-commercial Low-carbon Energy Technology , 2008 .

[34]  Senay Solak,et al.  Climate change and optimal energy technology R&D policy , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  David Popp,et al.  Entice-Br: The Effects of Backstop Technology R&D on Climate Policy Models , 2004 .

[36]  Nidhi Santen,et al.  Technology investment decisions under uncertainty : a new modeling framework for the electric power sector , 2012 .

[37]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Vol. II , 1976 .

[38]  David Popp,et al.  Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change , 2009 .

[39]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  ERIS: A model prototype with endogenous technological change , 2000 .

[40]  Venkatesh Narayanamurti,et al.  Transforming U.S. Energy Innovation , 2014 .