Bubble-induced skin-friction drag reduction and the abrupt transition to air-layer drag reduction

To investigate the phenomena of skin-friction drag reduction in a turbulent boundary layer (TBL) at large scales and high Reynolds numbers, a set of experiments has been conducted at the US Navy's William B. Morgan Large Cavitation Channel (LCC). Drag reduction was achieved by injecting gas (air) from a line source through the wall of a nearly zero-pressure-gradient TBL that formed on a flat-plate test model that was either hydraulically smooth or fully rough. Two distinct drag-reduction phenomena were investigated; bubble drag reduction (BDR) and air-layer drag reduction (ALDR). The streamwise distribution of skin-friction drag reduction was monitored with six skin-friction balances at downstream-distance-based Reynolds numbers to 220 million and at test speeds to 20.0ms−1. Near-wall bulk void fraction was measured at twelve streamwise locations with impedance probes, and near-wall (0 < Y < 5mm) bubble populations were estimated with a bubble imaging system. The instrument suite was used to investigate the scaling of BDR and the requirements necessary to achieve ALDR. Results from the BDR experiments indicate that: significant drag reduction (>25%) is limited to the first few metres downstream of injection; marginal improvement was possible with a porous-plate versus an open-slot injector design; BDR has negligible sensitivity to surface tension; bubble size is independent of surface tension downstream of injection; BDR is insensitive to boundary-layer thickness at the injection location; and no synergetic effect is observed with compound injection. Using these data, previous BDR scaling methods are investigated, but data collapse is observed only with the ‘initial zone’ scaling, which provides little information on downstream persistence of BDR. ALDR was investigated with a series of experiments that included a slow increase in the volumetric flux of air injected at free-stream speeds to 15.3ms−1. These results indicated that there are three distinct regions associated with drag reduction with air injection: Region I, BDR; Region II, transition between BDR and ALDR; and Region III, ALDR. In addition, once ALDR was established: friction drag reduction in excess of 80% was observed over the entire smooth model for speeds to 15.3ms−1; the critical volumetric flux of air required to achieve ALDR was observed to be approximately proportional to the square of the free-stream speed; slightly higher injection rates were required for ALDR if the surface tension was decreased; stable air layers were formed at free-stream speeds to 12.5ms−1 with the surface fully roughened (though approximately 50% greater volumetric air flux was required); and ALDR was sensitive to the inflow conditions. The sensitivity to the inflow conditions can be mitigated by employing a small faired step (10mm height in the experiment) that helps to create a fixed separation line.

[1]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Numerical Investigations Into the Mechanisms of Microbubble Drag Reduction , 1985 .

[2]  S. Deutsch,et al.  The influence of the type of gas on the reduction of skin friction drag by microbubble injection , 1992 .

[3]  James S. Uhlman,et al.  Microbubble Formulation and Splitting in a Turbulent Boundary Layer for Turbulenee Reduction , 1989 .

[4]  Said Elghobashi,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF BUBBLE-LADEN TURBULENT FLOWS USING THE TWO-FLUID FORMULATION , 1998 .

[5]  Steven L. Ceccio,et al.  A review of electrical impedance techniques for the measurement of multiphase flows , 1991 .

[6]  Takafumi Kawamura,et al.  Effect of Bubble Size on the Microbubble Drag Reduction of a Turbulent Boundary Layer , 2002 .

[7]  Hiroharu Kato,et al.  A Full-scale Experiment on Microbubbles for Skin Friction Reduction Using "SEIUN MARU" , 2002 .

[8]  David R. Dowling,et al.  Bubble friction drag reduction in a high-Reynolds-number flat-plate turbulent boundary layer , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  C. Merkle Drag Reduction in Liquid Boundary Layers by Gas Injection , 2008 .

[10]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Microbubble Drag Reduction in Rough Walled Turbulent Boundary Layers , 2003 .

[11]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Measurements of local skin friction in a microbubble-modified turbulent boundary layer , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  D. L. George,et al.  Measurement of the Bubbly Flow Beneath Partial Attached Cavities Using Electrical Impedance Probes , 2000 .

[13]  W. F. Ballhaus,et al.  Advances in fluid dynamics , 1989 .

[14]  John L. Lumley,et al.  Drag reduction in turbulent flow by polymer additives , 1973 .

[15]  J. R. T. Lahey,et al.  Measurement of Two-Phase Flow Parameters , 1979 .

[16]  J. Maxwell A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism , 1873, Nature.

[17]  Y. Kodama,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MICROBUBBLES AND THEIR APPLICABILITY TO SHIPS FOR SKIN FRICTION REDUCTION , 2000, Proceeding of First Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[18]  S. Nagaya,et al.  1 Mechanisms and Scale Effects of Skin Friction Reduction by Microbubbles , 2001 .

[19]  Gretar Tryggvason,et al.  The effect of bubbles on the wall drag in a turbulent channel flow , 2005 .

[20]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Microbubble skin friction reduction on an axisymmetric body under the influence of applied axial pressure gradients , 1991 .

[21]  Dennis M. Bushnell,et al.  Drag Reduction in Liquid Boundary Layers by Gas Injection , 1990 .

[22]  Marc Perlin,et al.  Influence of bubble size on micro-bubble drag reduction , 2006 .

[23]  F. White Viscous Fluid Flow , 1974 .

[24]  Marc Perlin,et al.  Bubble-size distributions produced by wall injection of air into flowing freshwater, saltwater and surfactant solutions , 2004 .

[25]  M. Perlin,et al.  Measurement of near-wall stratified bubbly flows using electrical impedance , 2005 .

[26]  Wendy Carol Sanders Bubble drag reduction in a flat plate boundary layer at high Reynolds numbers and large scales. , 2004 .

[27]  W. Schultz,et al.  In situ force-balance tensiometry , 1999 .

[28]  Stefan Luther,et al.  Drag reduction in bubbly Taylor-Couette turbulence. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[29]  John L. Lumley,et al.  Drag reduction in two phase and polymer flows , 1976 .

[30]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Microbubble drag reduction in liquid turbulent boundary layers , 1992 .

[31]  Osamu Watanabe,et al.  Measurements of drag reduction by microbubbles using very long ship models , 1998 .

[32]  S. Deutsch,et al.  A comparison of shear stress fluctuation statistics between microbubble modified and polymer modified turbulent boundary layers , 1989 .

[33]  Steven Deutsch,et al.  Reduction of Turbulent Skin Friction by Microbubbles , 1984 .

[34]  W. Schultz,et al.  Linear and nonlinear gravity-capillary water waves with a soluble surfactant , 2001 .

[35]  F. Schultz-grunow New frictional resistance law for smooth plates , 1941 .

[36]  David R. Dowling,et al.  High Reynolds number experimentation in the US Navy's William B Morgan Large Cavitation Channel , 2005 .

[37]  Rameswar Bhattacharyya,et al.  DRAG REDUCTION OF A SUBMERSIBLE HULL BY ELECTROLYSIS , 1973 .