Steering the Volume of Tissue Activated With a Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Lead in the Globus Pallidus Pars Interna: A Modeling Study With Heterogeneous Tissue Properties

Objective: To study the effect of directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode configuration and vertical electrode spacing on the volume of tissue activated (VTA) in the globus pallidus, pars interna (GPi). Background: Directional DBS leads may allow clinicians to precisely direct current fields to different functional networks within traditionally targeted brain areas. Modeling the shape and size of the VTA for various monopolar or bipolar configurations can inform clinical programming strategies for GPi DBS. However, many computational models of VTA are limited by assuming tissue homogeneity. Methods: We generated a multimodal image-based detailed anatomical (MIDA) computational model with a directional DBS lead (1.5 mm or 0.5 mm vertical electrode spacing) placed with segmented contact 2 at the ventral posterolateral “sensorimotor” region of the GPi. The effect of tissue heterogeneity was examined by replacing the MIDA tissues with a homogeneous tissue of conductance 0.3 S/m. DBS pulses (amplitude: 1 mA, pulse width: 60 μs, frequency: 130 Hz) were used to produce VTAs. The following DBS contact configurations were tested: single-segment monopole (2B-/Case+), two-segment monopole (2A-/2B-/Case+ and 2B-/3B-/Case+), ring monopole (2A-/2B-/2C-/Case+), one-cathode three-anode bipole (2B-/3A+/3B+/3C+), three-cathode three-anode bipole (2A-/2B-/2C-/3A+/3B+/3C+). Additionally, certain vertical configurations were repeated with 2 mA current amplitude. Results: Using a heterogeneous tissue model affected both the size and shape of the VTA in GPi. Electrodes with both 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm vertical spacing (1 mA) modeling showed that the single segment monopolar VTA was entirely contained within the GPi when the active electrode is placed at the posterolateral “sensorimotor” GPi. Two segments in a same ring and ring settings, however, produced VTAs outside of the GPi border that spread into adjacent white matter pathways, e.g., optic tract and internal capsule. Both stacked monopolar settings and vertical bipolar settings allowed activation of structures dorsal to the GPi in addition to the GPi. Modeling of the stacked monopolar settings with the DBS lead with 0.5 mm vertical electrode spacing further restricted VTAs within the GPi, but the VTA volumes were smaller compared to the equivalent settings of 1.5 mm spacing.

[1]  O. Sürücü,et al.  Understanding the Effects and Adverse Reactions of Deep Brain Stimulation: Is It Time for a Paradigm Shift Toward a Focus on Heterogenous Biophysical Tissue Properties Instead of Electrode Design Only? , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  Lorenz M. Hofmann,et al.  Modeling of a Segmented Electrode for Desynchronizing Deep Brain Stimulation , 2011, Front. Neuroeng..

[3]  A. Parent,et al.  Axonal branching pattern of neurons of the subthalamic nucleus in primates , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  J. Vitek,et al.  Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Changes the Firing Pattern of Pallidal Neurons , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Creating and parameterizing patient-specific deep brain stimulation pathway-activation models using the hyperdirect pathway as an example , 2017, PloS one.

[6]  Günther Deuschl,et al.  Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia: 5-year follow-up of a randomised trial , 2012, The Lancet Neurology.

[7]  A L Benabid,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus or internal pallidal stimulation in young onset Parkinson's disease. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  M. Okun,et al.  STN vs. GPi deep brain stimulation for tremor suppression in Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[9]  Y Agid,et al.  Functional mapping of the human globus pallidus: contrasting effect of stimulation in the internal and external pallidum in Parkinson’s disease , 2000, Neuroscience.

[10]  Y. Agid,et al.  Failure of long-term pallidal stimulation corrected by subthalamic stimulation in PD , 2000, Neurology.

[11]  J. Vitek,et al.  Effect of globus pallidus internus stimulation on neuronal activity in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in the primate model of Parkinson's disease , 2012, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Clinical deep brain stimulation strategies for orientation-selective pathway activation , 2018, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  L. Geddes,et al.  The specific resistance of biological material—A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[14]  Y. Agid,et al.  Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: Opposite effects of stimulation in the pallidum , 1998, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[15]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Current steering to control the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[16]  D. Bowers,et al.  Cognition and mood in Parkinson's disease in subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus interna deep brain stimulation: The COMPARE Trial , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[17]  Bryan Howell,et al.  Quantifying axonal responses in patient-specific models of subthalamic deep brain stimulation , 2018, NeuroImage.

[18]  M. Okun,et al.  Subthalamic Nucleus Versus Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation: Translating the Rematch Into Clinical Practice , 2014 .

[19]  Daria Nesterovich Anderson,et al.  Anodic stimulation misunderstood: preferential activation of fiber orientations with anodic waveforms in deep brain stimulation , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  Daria Nesterovich Anderson,et al.  Evaluation of methodologies for computing the deep brain stimulation volume of tissue activated , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Quantifying the neural elements activated and inhibited by globus pallidus deep brain stimulation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Y. Agid,et al.  Long‐term effects of pallidal or subthalamic deep brain stimulation on quality of life in Parkinson's disease , 2009, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[23]  D. Pinault,et al.  Single striatofugal axons arborizing in both pallidal segments and in the substantia nigra in primates , 1995, Brain Research.

[24]  Debabrata Ghosh,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Activity in the Motor Thalamus during GPi-DBS in the MPTP Nonhuman Primate Model of Parkinson's Disease , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[25]  Siobhan Ewert,et al.  Probabilistic mapping of the antidystonic effect of pallidal neurostimulation: a multicentre imaging study. , 2019, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Svjetlana Miocinovic,et al.  Comparison of Globus Pallidus Interna and Subthalamic Nucleus in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease: An Institutional Experience and Review , 2017, Parkinson's disease.

[27]  Karin Wårdell,et al.  Influence of heterogeneous and anisotropic tissue conductivity on electric field distribution in deep brain stimulation , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[28]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Neural targets for relieving parkinsonian rigidity and bradykinesia with pallidal deep brain stimulation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Nader Pouratian,et al.  Comparing Current Steering Technologies for Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Using a Computational Model That Incorporates Heterogeneous Tissue Properties , 2019, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[30]  M. Delong,et al.  Acute stimulation in the external segment of the globus pallidus improves parkinsonian motor signs , 2004, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[31]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Role of Soft-Tissue Heterogeneity in Computational Models of Deep Brain Stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[32]  Jaimie M. Henderson,et al.  Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[33]  Kara A. Johnson,et al.  Image-based analysis and long-term clinical outcomes of deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome: a multisite study , 2019, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[34]  Lars Timmermann,et al.  Directional DBS increases side‐effect thresholds—A prospective, double‐blind trial , 2017, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[35]  G. S. Russo,et al.  Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation Modulates Thalamic Neuronal Activity , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.