A unified view of multitaper multivariate spectral estimation

SUMMARY The orthogonal multitaper framework for cross-spectral estimators provides a simple unifying structure for determining the corresponding statistical properties. Here crossspectral estimators are represented by a weighted average of orthogonally-tapered crossperiodograms, with the weights corresponding to a set of rescaled eigenvalues. Such a structure not only encompasses the Thomson estimators, using Slepian and sine tapers, but also Welch's weighted overlapped segment averaging estimator and lag window estimators including frequency-averaged cross-periodograms. The means, smoothing and leakage biases, variances and asymptotic distributions of such estimators can all be formulated in a common way; comparisons are made for a fixed number of degrees of freedom. The common structure of the estimators also provides a necessary condition for the invertibility of an estimated cross-spectral matrix, namely that the weight matrix of the estimator written in bilinear form must have rank greater than or equal to the dimension of the cross-spectral matrix. An example is given showing the importance of small leakage and thus illustrating that the various estimators need not be equivalent in practice.

[1]  U. Grenander,et al.  Statistical analysis of stationary time series , 1957 .

[2]  M. Foster,et al.  THE COEFFICIENT OF COHERENCE: ITS ESTIMATION AND USE IN GEOPHYSICAL DATA PROCESSING , 1967 .

[3]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[4]  D. G. Watts,et al.  Spectral analysis and its applications , 1968 .

[5]  L. H. Koopmans The spectral analysis of time series , 1974 .

[6]  C. Chatfield,et al.  Fourier Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  D. Slepian Prolate spheroidal wave functions, fourier analysis, and uncertainty — V: the discrete case , 1978, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[8]  D. Thomson,et al.  Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  D. B. Preston Spectral Analysis and Time Series , 1983 .

[10]  R.E. White,et al.  Signal and noise estimation from seismic reflection data using spectral coherence methods , 1984, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  G. Carter Coherence and time delay estimation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  David J. Thomson,et al.  Coherence established between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature , 1990, Nature.

[13]  A. Walden WAVELET ESTIMATION USING THE MULTITAPER METHOD1 , 1991 .

[14]  Thomas P. Bronez,et al.  On the performance advantage of multitaper spectral analysis , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Time Series: Theory and Methods (2nd ed.). , 1992 .

[16]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications , 1993 .

[17]  D. Percival Spectral Analysis of Univariate and Bivariate Time Series , 1994 .

[18]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  The variance of multitaper spectrum estimates for real Gaussian processes , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  Kurt S. Riedel,et al.  Minimum bias multiple taper spectral estimation , 2018, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[20]  Andrew T. Walden,et al.  Seismic wavelet estimation: a frequency domain solution to a geophysical noisy input-output problem , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Lag-windowing and multiple-data-windowing are roughly equivalent for smooth spectrum estimation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..