Multicomponent microseismic data denoising by 3D shearlet transform

The low-magnitude microseismic signals generated by fracture initiation are generally buried in strong background noise, which complicates their interpretation. Thus, noise suppression is a significant step. We propose an effective multicomponent, multidimensional microseismic-data denoising method by conducting a simplified polarization analysis in the 3D shearlet transform domain. The 3D shearlet transform is very competitive in dealing with multidimensional data as it captures details of signals at different scales and orientations, which benefits signal and noise separation. We propose a novel processing strategy based on a signal- detection operator which can effectively identify signal coefficients in the shearlet domain by taking the correlation and energy distribution of three-component microseismic signals into account. We perform tests on synthetic and real datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively remove random noise and preserve weak signals.

[1]  S. Mostafa Mousavi,et al.  Adaptive noise estimation and suppression for improving microseismic event detection , 2016 .

[2]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  A method for low-frequency noise suppression based on mathematical morphology in microseismic monitoring , 2016 .

[3]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  3D curvelet transforms and astronomical data restoration , 2010, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis.

[4]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Double Sparsity Dictionary for Seismic Noise Attenuation , 2016 .

[5]  Demetrio Labate,et al.  Optimally Sparse Multidimensional Representation Using Shearlets , 2007, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[6]  G. Easley,et al.  Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform , 2008 .

[7]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  Microseismic Monitoring Developments in Hydraulic Fracture Stimulation , 2013 .

[9]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Simultaneous dictionary learning and denoising for seismic data , 2014 .

[10]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  Spectral estimation—What is new? What is next? , 2014 .

[11]  Demetrio Labate,et al.  Optimally sparse 3D approximations using shearlet representations , 2010 .

[12]  Bin Li,et al.  Multimodal Medical Volumetric Data Fusion Using 3-D Discrete Shearlet Transform and Global-to-Local Rule , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Radon transform-based microseismic event detection and signal-to-noise ratio enhancement , 2015 .

[14]  Junping Du,et al.  Image Sequence Fusion and Denoising Based on 3D Shearlet Transform , 2014, J. Appl. Math..

[15]  Pooran Singh Negi,et al.  3-D Discrete Shearlet Transform and Video Processing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Jiajun Han,et al.  Microseismic and seismic denoising via ensemble empirical mode decomposition and adaptive thresholding , 2015 .

[17]  M. Sacchi,et al.  Microseismic data denoising using a 3C group sparsity constrained time-frequency transform , 2012 .

[18]  E. Candès,et al.  The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse , 2004, math/0407210.

[19]  A. Bunger,et al.  Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing , 2013 .