University-industry collaborations and product innovation performance: the moderating effects of absorptive capacity and innovation competencies

While the performance implications of university-industry collaboration (UIC) have been the subject of extensive research, no study thus far has investigated the potential influence of absorptive capacity and innovation competencies on the relationship between UIC and product innovation performance. Based on a sample of 2061 German companies from two waves of the German Community Innovation Survey and using moderated multiple regression, this study examines these moderating effects and provides the following findings: (1) absorptive capacity in terms of internal R&D negatively moderates the relationship between UIC and incremental innovation performance and has no effect on the relationship between UIC and radical innovation performance; (2) absorptive capacity related to employee know-how has no moderating effect on the relationship between UIC and incremental innovation performance but positively moderates the relationship between UIC and radical innovation performance; and (3) innovation competencies exert no moderating effect on the relationship between UIC and incremental innovation performance but have a predominantly positive moderating effect on the relationship between UIC and radical innovation performance. In summary, our study provides relevant insights on the dynamics governing UIC relationships and provides evidence for potential negative effects of absorptive capacity in the context of collaborative R&D (substitution effect). Providing an in-depth analysis of UIC, this study offers insights for research in this field by explaining the variance in the outcomes of UIC. Moreover, our findings have the potential to aid practitioners (e.g., innovation managers, researchers, and governing and funding bodies) in their decisions concerning their involvement in UIC.

[1]  Stefan Brehm,et al.  University–industry linkages and absorptive capacity: an empirical analysis of China's manufacturing industry , 2012 .

[2]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[3]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[4]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[5]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[6]  Kurt A. Heppard,et al.  An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation , 2003 .

[7]  Chwo-Ming Joseph Yu,et al.  The effect of competitive and non-competitive R&D collaboration on firm innovation , 2011 .

[8]  M. Frenz,et al.  The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[9]  Ana M. Bernardos Barbolla,et al.  Critical factors for success in university–industry research projects , 2009 .

[10]  M. Woerter.  Technology proximity between firms and universities and technology transfer , 2012 .

[11]  H. Theil.  Introduction to econometrics , 1978 .

[12]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[13]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[14]  J. Sharp,et al.  The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance , 2008 .

[15]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[16]  A. Neely,et al.  Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity , 2008 .

[17]  R. L. Jensen,et al.  Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights , 2007 .

[18]  M. Carree,et al.  Inter-temporal patterns of R&D collaboration and innovative performance , 2014, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[19]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies , 2002 .

[20]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry , 2010 .

[21]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[22]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[23]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[24]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  THE IMPACT OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY ON SMEs' COLLABORATION , 2007 .

[25]  Tobias Schmidt,et al.  Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Co-Operation - Happy Together? , 2008 .

[26]  Noel P. Greis,et al.  Firm size and dynamic technological innovation , 2002 .

[27]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[28]  Jeroen P.J. de Jong,et al.  Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms , 2010 .

[29]  James A. Cunningham,et al.  Fostering university-industry R&D collaborations in European Union countries , 2015 .

[30]  Francisco Lima,et al.  Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners , 2010 .

[31]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[32]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[33]  Petr Hanel,et al.  Industry–University Collaboration by Canadian Manufacturing Firms* , 2006 .

[34]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Firm-Specific Competencies Determining Technological Innovation: A Survey in Greece , 2002 .

[35]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[36]  A. Agrawal.  University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions , 2001 .

[37]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[38]  Joe Tidd,et al.  From Knowledge Management to Strategic Competence:Measuring Technological, Market and Organisational Innovation , 2000 .

[39]  W. Sofka,et al.  Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries , 2009 .

[40]  Sally Caird,et al.  How important is the innovator for the commercial success of innovative products in SMEs , 1994 .

[41]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[42]  Vangelis Souitaris,et al.  Technological trajectories as moderators of firm-level determinants of innovation , 2002 .

[43]  S. Iammarino,et al.  Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry , 2017 .

[44]  Daniel L. Fay,et al.  Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art , 2012, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[45]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[46]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practices and Principles , 1986 .

[47]  Paula E. Stephan.  Educational Implications of University–Industry Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[48]  Nola Hewitt-Dundas.  The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation , 2013 .

[49]  Toshihiro Kodama,et al.  The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages—An empirical study of TAMA in Japan , 2008 .

[50]  O. W. Maietta,et al.  Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry , 2015 .

[51]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[52]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[53]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[54]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Key Characteristics of the Large Innovating Firm , 1991 .

[55]  S. Sedita,et al.  How Do Collaborations with Universities Affect Firms' Innovative Performance? The Role of "Pasteur Scientists" in the Advanced Materials Field , 2009 .

[56]  C. Cozza,et al.  Firm heterogeneity, absorptive capacity and technical linkages with external parties in Italy , 2016 .

[57]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Managing External Knowledge Flows: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[58]  M. Perkmann,et al.  The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-Industry Relations on Public Research , 2009 .

[59]  C. V. Beers,et al.  R&D Cooperation, Partner Diversity, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Analysis† , 2014 .

[60]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Measuring innovation competencies for integrated services in the communications industry , 2010 .

[61]  T. Daim,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer , 2007 .

[62]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[63]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[64]  Wolfgang Keller,et al.  Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development , 1996 .

[65]  W. Baumol.  The Free-Market Innovation Machine - Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism , 2002 .

[66]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  The “Traffic” in Graduate Students: Graduate Students as Tokens of Exchange between Academe and Industry , 2002 .

[67]  J. A. Keizer,et al.  Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs.: An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands , 2002 .

[68]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[69]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Heterogeneous Firm‐Level Effects of Knowledge Exchanges on Product Innovation: Differences between Dynamic and Lagging Product Innovators* , 2010 .

[70]  Thomas Ritter.  Communicating firm competencies: Marketing as different levels of translation , 2006 .

[71]  John Bessant,et al.  Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review , 1998 .

[72]  Anna Giunta,et al.  University–Industry collaboration in the biopharmaceuticals: the Italian case , 2016 .

[73]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[74]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[75]  S. Liao,et al.  Developing a sustainable competitive advantage: absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and organizational learning , 2017 .

[76]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[77]  Martti Lindman,et al.  Open or closed strategy in developing new products? A case study of industrial NPD in SMEs , 2002 .

[78]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[79]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  University–industry collaboration and regional wealth , 2016 .

[80]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[81]  Tobias Schmidt,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: One Size Fits All? Firm-level Analysis of Absorptive Capacity for Different Kinds of Knowledge , 2005 .

[82]  P. Ritala,et al.  Incremental and Radical Innovation in Coopetition—The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability , 2013 .

[83]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  External Sources of Knowledge, Governance Mode, and R&D Performance , 2005 .

[84]  R. Handfield,et al.  Involving Suppliers in New Product Development , 1999 .

[85]  Kira Fabrizio.  Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation , 2009 .

[86]  D. Libaers.  Time Allocations Across Collaborations of Academic Scientists and Their Impact on Efforts to Commercialize Novel Technologies: Is More Always Better? , 2017 .

[87]  S. Robin,et al.  The influence of public programs on inter-firm R&D collaboration strategies: project-level evidence from EU FP5 and FP6 , 2012 .

[88]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[89]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[90]  L. Cricelli,et al.  ASSESSING THE OPEN INNOVATION TRENDS BY MEANS OF THE EUROSTAT COMMUNITY INNOVATION SURVEY , 2016 .

[91]  Qiang Tu,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices , 2006 .