Model-Driven assessment of use cases for dependable systems

Complex real-time systems need to address dependability requirements early on in the development process. This paper presents a model-based approach that allows developers to analyze the dependability of use cases and to discover more reliable and safe ways of designing the interactions with the system and the environment. We use a probabilistic extension of statecharts to model the system requirements. The model is then evaluated analytically based on the success and failure probabilities of events. The analysis may lead to further refinement of the use cases by introducing detection and recovery measures to ensure dependable system interaction. A visual modelling environment for our extended statecharts formalism supporting automatic probability analysis has been implemented in AToM3, A Tool for Multi-formalism and Meta-Modelling. Our approach is illustrated with an elevator control system case study.

[1]  Joost-Pieter Katoen,et al.  A probabilistic extension of UML statecharts: Specification and Verification. , 2002 .

[2]  Joost-Pieter Katoen,et al.  A Probabilistic Extension of UML Statecharts , 2002, FTRTFT.

[3]  Craig Larman,et al.  Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process , 2001 .

[4]  David Harel,et al.  On visual formalisms , 1988, CACM.

[5]  Andrew Hinton,et al.  PRISM: A Tool for Automatic Verification of Probabilistic Systems , 2006, TACAS.

[6]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Analysis of Typical Fault-Tolerant Architectures using HARP , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[7]  Hermann Kopetz,et al.  Dependability: Basic Concepts and Terminology , 1992 .

[8]  Mario Dal Cin,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of UML Statechart Models of Dependable Systems , 2002, Comput. J..

[9]  Brian Randell,et al.  Fundamental Concepts of Dependability , 2000 .

[10]  Juan de Lara,et al.  Defining visual notations and their manipulation through meta-modelling and graph transformation , 2004, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[11]  John Gannon,et al.  State-based model checking of event-driven system requirements , 1991, SIGSOFT '91.

[12]  Nandamudi Lankalapalli Vijaykumar,et al.  Introducing probabilities in Statecharts to specify reactive systems for performance analysis , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[13]  Juan de Lara,et al.  Computer Aided Multi-paradigm Modelling to Process Petri-Nets and Statecharts , 2002, ICGT.

[14]  Juan de Lara,et al.  AToM3: A Tool for Multi-formalism and Meta-modelling , 2002, FASE.

[15]  Jörg Kienzle,et al.  Exceptional use cases , 2005, MoDELS'05.

[16]  Holger Hermanns,et al.  QoS modelling and analysis with UML-statecharts: the StoCharts approach , 2005, PERV.

[17]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Modeling and analysis of system dependability using the System Availability Estimator , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE 24th International Symposium on Fault- Tolerant Computing.

[18]  Juan de Lara,et al.  Modelling and analysis of traffic networks based on graph transformation , 2005 .

[19]  David Harel,et al.  Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems , 1987, Sci. Comput. Program..

[20]  Huining Feng DCHARTS, A FORMALISM FOR MODELING AND SIMULATION BASED DESIGN OF REACTIVE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[21]  Jean-Claude Geffroy,et al.  Design of Dependable Computing Systems , 2002, Springer Netherlands.

[22]  Andrea Bianco,et al.  Model Checking of Probabalistic and Nondeterministic Systems , 1995, FSTTCS.