Multidimensional coding of auditory icons

Auditory icons – or environmental sounds – have the potential to convey information by non-verbal means quickly and accurately. In addition, human listeners are quick to determine many qualities of an auditory object, such as location, distance, size, and motion, from acoustics of the signal. An experiment tests these two coupled assumptions in a controlled laboratory context. Stimuli consisted of auditory icons “loaded” with information achieved through systematic manipulation of the acoustic parameters pitch, volume ramping, and reverberation. Sixty adult listeners were asked to recognize and describe four auditory icons wherein object size, distance and direction of motion were captured in the parameters of each 1-second sound. Participants were accurate at recognizing and interpreting the icons 70-80% of the time. As hypothesized, recognition rate decreased as the number of parameters needing to be recognized increased. There was a significant effect of icons type and parameter manipulation: dog bark was the most easily recognized icon, and the direction parameter interpreted most accurately. Implications of the findings for applied contexts are discussed.

[1]  R Hétu,et al.  Audibility and identification of auditory alarms in the operating room and intensive care unit. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[2]  William W. Gaver Auditory Icons: Using Sound in Computer Interfaces , 1986, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Dan Gärdenfors gardenfors Auditory Interfaces A Design Platform , 2001 .

[4]  Peter Keller,et al.  Meaning from environmental sounds: types of signal-referent relations and their effect on recognizing auditory icons. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Meera Blattner,et al.  Earcons and Icons: Their Structure and Common Design Principles , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  R. R. Patterson,et al.  Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft , 1982 .

[7]  R. Patterson Auditory warning sounds in the work environment. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  Judy Edworthy,et al.  Warning design : a research prospective , 1996 .

[9]  D J Folds,et al.  Auditory signals in military aircraft: ergonomics principles versus practice. , 1986, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Mark C. Detweiler,et al.  Iconic Reference: Evolving Perspectives and an Organizing Framework , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[11]  J. Ballas Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds , 1993 .

[12]  D R Begault,et al.  Three-dimensional audio versus head-down traffic alert and collision avoidance system displays. , 1996, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[13]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  Extracting Meaning from Sound: Nomic Mappings, Everyday Listening, and Perceiving Object Size from Frequency , 2004 .

[14]  R Graham,et al.  Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. , 1999, Ergonomics.