National culture and its effects on knowledge communication in online virtual communities

Online virtual communities provide a powerful means of knowledge sharing. Despite the prevalence of online virtual communities, there is a paucity of research to investigate the effect of national culture differences on knowledge sharing in online virtual communities. Are there differences between online virtual communities from different national cultures? This research studies the differences in knowledge-sharing activities between US-based and China-based online virtual communities. Hofstede's dimensions of national culture serve as the theoretical foundation for this research.

[1]  Mark F. Peterson,et al.  The Manager as Mediator of Alternative Meanings: A pilot Study from China, The USA and U.K. , 1996 .

[2]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[3]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[4]  T. Friedman The World Is Flat [Updated and Expanded]: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century , 2006 .

[5]  Alfons Trompenaars,et al.  Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business , 1993 .

[6]  David G. Schwartz,et al.  Internet-Based Organizational Memory and Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[7]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[8]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  IT takes a village: Virtual communities in support of education , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[9]  C. Ruppel,et al.  Sharing knowledge through intranets: a study of organizational culture and intranet implementation , 2001 .

[10]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. , 1988 .

[11]  Kirk St. Amant,et al.  Integrating Intercultural Online Learning Experiences into the Computer Classroom , 2002 .

[12]  Mikael Søndergaard,et al.  Research Note: Hofstede's Consequences: A Study of Reviews, Citations and Replications , 1994 .

[13]  Y. Aharoni Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[14]  Zhiting Zhu,et al.  A Learning Framework for Knowledge Building and Collective Wisdom Advancement in Virtual Learning Communities , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[15]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[16]  Maria Bakardjieva,et al.  Virtual Togetherness: an Everyday-life Perspective , 2003 .

[17]  S. Schwartz Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[18]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[19]  P. Earley,et al.  Culture, self-identity, and work , 1993 .

[20]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Carlos Evia,et al.  Quality over quantity: a two-step model for reinforcing user feedback in transnational Web-based systems through participatory design , 2004 .

[22]  P. Earley Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. , 1994 .

[23]  Keng Siau,et al.  Knowledge management mechanisms of financial service sites , 2005, CACM.

[24]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[26]  Joanna L. Y. Ho,et al.  The Openness of Knowledge Sharing within Organizations: A Comparative Study of the United States and the People's Republic of China , 2000 .

[27]  K. Siau Knowledge Discovery as an Aid to Organizational Creativity , 2000 .

[28]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  The Unbearable Likeness of Being Digital: The Persistence of Nonverbal Social Norms in Online Virtual Environments , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  Jyuji Misumi,et al.  Event management and work team effectiveness in Japan, Britain and USA , 1994 .

[30]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Culture vultures: considering culture and communication in virtual environments , 2000, SIGG.

[31]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Toward Virtual Community Knowledge Evolution , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Keng Siau,et al.  Internet, World Wide Web, and Creativity , 1999 .

[33]  P. Boczkowski Mutual Shaping of Users and Technologies in a National Virtual Community , 1999 .

[34]  N. Staggers INTERNET-BASED ORGANIZATIONAL MEMORY AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT , 2002 .

[35]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[36]  Keng Siau,et al.  Knowledge Management Mechanisms in E-Commerce: A Study of Online Retailing and Auction Sites , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  How learning by doing is done: problem identification in novel process equipment☆ , 1995 .

[38]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Sharing knowledge , 2008, CACM.

[39]  Anil Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Management’s Social Dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel , 2000 .

[40]  Jyun-Cheng Wang,et al.  An Automated Tool for Managing Interactions in Virtual Communities-Using Social Network Analysis Approach , 2004, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[41]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[42]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Trust-Supporting Components in Virtual Communities for Patients , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  National culture, information systems, and organizational implications , 1994 .

[45]  Doug Schuler,et al.  New community networks - wired for change , 1996 .

[46]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[47]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[48]  G. Roland Kaye,et al.  Global business and cross-cultural information systems: Technical and institutional dimensions of diffusion , 1996, Inf. Technol. People.