High-Level Clonal FGFR Amplification and Response to FGFR Inhibition in a Translational Clinical Trial.

UNLABELLED FGFR1 and FGFR2 are amplified in many tumor types, yet what determines response to FGFR inhibition in amplified cancers is unknown. In a translational clinical trial, we show that gastric cancers with high-level clonal FGFR2 amplification have a high response rate to the selective FGFR inhibitor AZD4547, whereas cancers with subclonal or low-level amplification did not respond. Using cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models, we show that high-level FGFR2 amplification initiates a distinct oncogene addiction phenotype, characterized by FGFR2-mediated transactivation of alternative receptor kinases, bringing PI3K/mTOR signaling under FGFR control. Signaling in low-level FGFR1-amplified cancers is more restricted to MAPK signaling, limiting sensitivity to FGFR inhibition. Finally, we show that circulating tumor DNA screening can identify high-level clonally amplified cancers. Our data provide a mechanistic understanding of the distinct pattern of oncogene addiction seen in highly amplified cancers and demonstrate the importance of clonality in predicting response to targeted therapy. SIGNIFICANCE Robust single-agent response to FGFR inhibition is seen only in high-level FGFR-amplified cancers, with copy-number level dictating response to FGFR inhibition in vitro, in vivo, and in the clinic. High-level amplification of FGFR2 is relatively rare in gastric and breast cancers, and we show that screening for amplification in circulating tumor DNA may present a viable strategy to screen patients. Cancer Discov; 6(8); 838-51. ©2016 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 803.

[1]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[2]  John M S Bartlett,et al.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[3]  N. Turner,et al.  Determination of HER2 Amplification Status on Tumour DNA by Digital PCR , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  B. Spencer‐Dene,et al.  Requirement for Interaction of PI3-Kinase p110α with RAS in Lung Tumor Maintenance , 2013, Cancer cell.

[5]  B. Spencer‐Dene,et al.  Requirement for Interaction of PI3-Kinase p110 alpha with RAS in Lung Tumor Maintenance , 2013 .

[6]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Parallel RNA interference screens identify EGFR activation as an escape mechanism in FGFR3-mutant cancer. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[7]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Noninvasive Detection of HER2 Amplification with Plasma DNA Digital PCR , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  Fabrice Andre,et al.  Fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors as a cancer treatment: from a biologic rationale to medical perspectives. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[9]  A. Sivachenko,et al.  Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Andrew P Thomas,et al.  AZD4547: an orally bioavailable, potent, and selective inhibitor of the fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase family. , 2012, Cancer research.

[11]  M. Knowles,et al.  Small molecule FGF receptor inhibitors block FGFR-dependent urothelial carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  M. DePristo,et al.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. , 2010, Genome research.

[13]  N. Turner,et al.  Fibroblast growth factor signalling: from development to cancer , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  T. Chou Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method. , 2010, Cancer research.

[15]  M. Razzaque,et al.  The FGF23–Klotho axis: endocrine regulation of phosphate homeostasis , 2009, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[16]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  Disease-free survival according to degree of HER2 amplification for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without 1 year of trastuzumab: the HERA Trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[18]  C. Der,et al.  Aberrant Receptor Internalization and Enhanced FRS2-dependent Signaling Contribute to the Transforming Activity of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 IIIb C3 Isoform* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Kevin R. Coombes,et al.  The Bimodality Index: A Criterion for Discovering and Ranking Bimodal Signatures from Cancer Gene Expression Profiling Data , 2009, Cancer informatics.

[20]  Cem Elbi,et al.  FGFR2-amplified gastric cancer cell lines require FGFR2 and Erbb3 signaling for growth and survival. , 2008, Cancer research.

[21]  C. V. D. van de Velde,et al.  Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  I. Lax,et al.  Stimulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by fibroblast growth factor receptors is mediated by coordinated recruitment of multiple docking proteins , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  C. Kahn,et al.  Positive and Negative Regulation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase-Dependent Signaling Pathways by Three Different Gene Products of the p85α Regulatory Subunit , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  Deletion of the carboxyl-terminal exons of K-sam/FGFR2 by short homology-mediated recombination, generating preferential expression of specific messenger RNAs. , 1999, Cancer research.