Burden on hydropower units for short-term balancing of renewable power systems

There is a general need to change hydropower operational regimes to balance the growing contribution of variable renewable energy sources in power systems. Quantifying the burden on generation equipment is increasingly uncertain and difficult. Here, we propose a framework combining technical and economic indicators to analyze primary frequency control (PFC) on a timescale of seconds. We develop a model integrating hydraulic, mechanical, and electrical subsystems to characterize efficiency loss, wear and fatigue, regulation mileage, and frequency quality. We evaluate burden relief strategies under three idealized remuneration schemes for PFC, inspired by those used in Sweden, the USA, and China, respectively. We show how burden and compensation vary under future scenarios of renewable power systems. Our framework can be used by producers to develop favorable operation strategies that reduce burden and increase economic value, and by transmission system operators to provide insights on the relation between incentive structures and regulating performance.Quantifying burden on hydropower units for balancing variable renewable energy sources has been uncertain and difficult. Herein Yang et al. propose a framework and characterize the burden, performance and compensation of hydropower regulation of renewable power systems.

[1]  Radivoje Mitrovic,et al.  Failure analysis of hydraulic turbine shaft , 2012 .

[2]  Antonio Simoes Costa,et al.  Hydroelectric unit commitment for power plants composed of distinct groups of generating units , 2016 .

[3]  Bryan W. Karney,et al.  A selected literature review of efficiency improvements in hydraulic turbines , 2015 .

[4]  David Elliott,et al.  A balancing act for renewables , 2016, Nature Energy.

[5]  Sudhir Gupta,et al.  Case Studies , 2013, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[6]  Nathan S. Lewis,et al.  Deconstructing Biomass [part of The frontiers of energy] , 2016 .

[7]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Variability Characteristics of European Wind and Solar Power Resources—A Review , 2016 .

[8]  Rocio Uria Martinez,et al.  Hydropower Vision A New Chapter for America's 1st Renewable Electricity Source , 2016 .

[9]  Andreas Sumper,et al.  Power oscillation damping supported by wind power: A review , 2012 .

[10]  D. Kirschen,et al.  A Survey of Frequency and Voltage Control Ancillary Services—Part II: Economic Features , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Michel Cervantes,et al.  Experimental investigation of a Kaplan draft tube – Part I: Best efficiency point , 2012 .

[12]  I. Graabak,et al.  Balancing of Variable Wind and Solar Production in Continental Europe with Nordic Hydropower – A Review of Simulation Studies☆ , 2016 .

[13]  A review , 2019 .

[14]  E. Ela,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Incentivizing the Frequency Responsive Reserve Ancillary Service , 2012 .

[15]  Philip Schniter,et al.  Efficiency based optimal control of Kaplan hydrogenerators , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[16]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  Final report , 2000 .

[17]  Reza Ghomashchi,et al.  Hydro turbine failure mechanisms: An overview , 2014 .

[18]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Market Designs for the Primary Frequency Response Ancillary Service—Part II: Case Studies , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Ulrich Seidel,et al.  Dynamic loads in Francis runners and their impact on fatigue life , 2014 .

[20]  D. Brooks,et al.  Quantifying the Value of Hydropower in the Electric Grid: Final Report , 2012 .

[21]  Thomas Gustafsson,et al.  Phasor extremum seeking and its application in Kaplan turbine control , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Control Applications (CCA).

[22]  Jim Read,et al.  Overview and Key Issues , 2009 .

[23]  Flore Remouit,et al.  Variability assessment and forecasting of renewables: A review for solar, wind, wave and tidal resources , 2015 .

[24]  Sufang Zhang,et al.  To what extent will China's ongoing electricity market reforms assist the integration of renewable energy? , 2018 .

[25]  Michel Cervantes,et al.  Experimental investigation of a Kaplan draft tube – Part II: Off-design conditions , 2012 .

[26]  G. F. Simmons Journal bearing design, lubrication and operation for enhanced performance , 2013 .

[27]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Operational flexibility and economics of power plants in future low-carbon power systems , 2015 .

[28]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Reforming the Chinese Electricity Supply Sector: Lessons from International Experience , 2017 .

[29]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems , 2017 .

[30]  D. Kirschen,et al.  A Survey of Frequency and Voltage Control Ancillary Services—Part I: Technical Features , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[31]  F. Genoese,et al.  Occurrence of negative prices on the German spot market for electricity and their influence on balancing power markets , 2010, 2010 7th International Conference on the European Energy Market.

[32]  Z. K. Shawwash,et al.  A Practical Hydro, Dynamic Unit Commitment and Loading Model , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[33]  Xin Liu,et al.  A review on fatigue damage mechanism in hydro turbines , 2016 .

[34]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Least-cost options for integrating intermittent renewables in low-carbon power systems , 2016 .

[35]  Secundino Soares,et al.  Minimum loss predispatch model for hydroelectric power systems , 1997 .

[36]  Torbjørn K. Nielsen,et al.  Dynamic load on a Francis turbine runner from simulations based on measurements , 2014 .

[37]  Chao Ma,et al.  Short-term electricity dispatch optimization of Ertan hydropower plant based on data by field tests , 2011 .

[38]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  An International Comparison , 2000 .

[39]  Edson da Costa Bortoni,et al.  Online optimal power distribution between units of a hydro power plant , 2015 .

[40]  R. Raineri,et al.  Technical and economic aspects of ancillary services markets in the electric power industry: an international comparison , 2006 .

[41]  C. Mitchell Momentum is increasing towards a flexible electricity system based on renewables , 2016, Nature Energy.

[42]  Bhupendra K. Gandhi,et al.  Effect of transients on Francis turbine runner life: a review , 2013 .

[43]  F. Førsund,et al.  Renewable Energy Expansion and the Value of Balance Regulation Power , 2010 .

[44]  P. Hearda,et al.  Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems , 2017 .

[45]  Rafael Waters,et al.  Net load variability in Nordic countries with a highly or fully renewable power system , 2016, Nature Energy.

[46]  Ahti Salo,et al.  How much is enough? Optimal support payments in a renewable-rich power system , 2016 .

[47]  Mehrdad Raisee,et al.  Effects of load variation on a Kaplan turbine runner , 2016 .

[48]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Representation of variable renewable energy sources in TIMER, an aggregated energy system simulation model , 2017 .

[49]  Lennart Söder Simplified analysis of balancing challenges in sustainable and smart energy systems with 100% renewable power supply , 2016 .

[50]  Hans-Jörg Huth,et al.  Fatigue Design of Hydraulic Turbine Runners , 2005 .

[51]  W. Deason Comparison of 100% renewable energy system scenarios with a focus on flexibility and cost , 2018 .

[52]  A. Witze,et al.  Energy alternatives: Electricity without carbon , 2008, Nature.

[53]  Rocio Uria-Martinez,et al.  2014 Hydropower Market Report , 2015 .

[54]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Norway as a Battery for the Future European Power System—Impacts on the Hydropower System , 2017 .

[55]  Urban Lundin,et al.  Wear Reduction for Hydropower Turbines Considering Frequency Quality of Power Systems: A Study on Controller Filters , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[56]  Rafał Gawarkiewicz,et al.  Wear measurements of self-lubricating bearing materials in small oscillatory movement , 2007 .

[57]  Sara Eftekharnejad,et al.  Impact of increased penetration of photovoltaic generation on power systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[58]  E. Lorenz,et al.  Short term fluctuations of wind and solar power systems , 2016, 1606.03426.

[59]  Vahan Gevorgian,et al.  Market Designs for the Primary Frequency Response Ancillary Service—Part I: Motivation and Design , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[60]  I. Technical Features , 1968 .

[61]  Jiandong Yang,et al.  Response time for primary frequency control of hydroelectric generating unit , 2016 .

[62]  Liu Ximei,et al.  The ancillary services in China: An overview and key issues , 2014 .

[63]  Dirk Witthaut,et al.  Non-Gaussian power grid frequency fluctuations characterized by Lévy-stable laws and superstatistics , 2018, Nature Energy.

[64]  Jiandong Yang,et al.  Wear and tear on hydro power turbines – Influence from primary frequency control , 2016 .

[65]  Tao Guo,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Value of Advanced Pumped Storage Hydropower in the United States , 2014 .

[66]  P. Mahadevan,et al.  An overview , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.