The limits of resumption in Welsh wh-dependencies

This chapter considers the analysis of gap and resumptive wh -dependencies, especially relative clauses, in Welsh. It is argued that, despite first appearances, all wh- dependencies formed on unembedded direct-object positions (and some embedded ones), including the direct object of an aspectual periphrasis, involve movement and a gap rather than a resumptive pronoun. The clitic found in these structures is analysed as a reflex of the movement operation itself, with clitics appearing in positions from which wh -movement has taken place. The presence of a clitic is therefore not diagnostic of resumption. This conclusion is then integrated into a more general analysis of Welsh wh-dependencies, in which the gap strategy is argued to be more widely available in other contexts too. It is shown that Welsh manifests more extensive successive-cyclic effects than generally acknowledged. A formal analysis is developed in which the various successive-cyclic effects are accounted for within a movement-based approach. Successive-cyclic movement in Welsh is mediated by escape hatches in SpecCP and SpecvP, but the absence of equivalent escape hatches at the DP or PP levels results in the resumption strategy occurring in those environments. This approach is then extended to cases where resumptive pronouns appear to have gap-like syntactic properties, leading to a ‘mixed’ analysis of resumptive relatives generally (base-generation of a resumptive pronoun with movement of a wh-operator from the specifier of the phrase triggering resumption).

[1]  Alain Rouveret,et al.  How are resumptive pronouns linked to the periphery , 2002 .

[2]  Joseph Aoun,et al.  Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions , 2003 .

[3]  James McCloskey,et al.  Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics: A Case Study in Modern Irish , 1979 .

[4]  David Adger,et al.  Merge and Move: Wh-Dependencies Revisited , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[5]  Elena Gavruseva,et al.  On the syntax of possessor extraction , 2000 .

[6]  V. Bianchi The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: A Reply to Borsley , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[7]  Robert Freidin,et al.  Foundational issues in linguistic theory : essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud , 2008 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[9]  Jamal Ouhalla,et al.  Subject-extraction, negation and the antiagreement effect , 1993 .

[10]  C. Boeckx Islands and Chains: Resumption as stranding , 2003 .

[11]  Richard S. Kayne The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[12]  David Willis,et al.  On the distribution of resumptive pronouns and wh-trace in Welsh , 2000, Journal of Linguistics.

[13]  Daniel L. Finer,et al.  Contrasting ā-Dependencies in Selayarese , 1997 .

[14]  Maggie Tallerman,et al.  Relativization strategies: NP accessibility in Welsh , 1990, Journal of Linguistics.

[15]  E. Keenan,et al.  Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar , 2008 .

[16]  James McCloskey,et al.  Resumptive pronouns, A-binding,and levels of representations in Irish , 2011 .

[17]  Robert D. Borsley,et al.  The Syntax of Welsh , 2007 .

[18]  James Mccloskey The morphosyntax of WH-extraction in Irish , 2001 .

[19]  James McCloskey,et al.  Resumption, Successive Cyclicity, and the Locality of Operations , 2008 .

[20]  Yael Sharvit,et al.  Resumptive Pronouns in Relative Clauses , 1999 .

[21]  Edit Doron,et al.  On the syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns , 2011 .