Shaping Strategic Action Through the Rhetorical Construction and Exploitation of Ambiguity

This paper extends existing understandings of how actors' constructions of ambiguity shape the emergent process of strategic action. We theoretically elaborate the role of rhetoric in exploiting strategic ambiguity, based on analysis of a longitudinal case study of an internationalization strategy within a business school. Our data show that actors use rhetoric to construct three types of strategic ambiguity: protective ambiguity that appeals to common values in order to protect particular interests, invitational ambiguity that appeals to common values in order to invite participation in particular actions, and adaptive ambiguity that enables the temporary adoption of specific values in order to appeal to a particular audience at one point in time. These rhetorical constructions of ambiguity follow a processual pattern that shapes the emergent process of strategic action. Our findings show that (1) the strategic actions that emerge are shaped by the way actors construct and exploit ambiguity, (2) the ambiguity intrinsic to the action is analytically distinct from ambiguity that is constructed and exploited by actors, and (3) ambiguity construction shifts over time to accommodate the emerging pattern of actions.

[1]  Peter Smith Ring,et al.  Strategic Management in Public and Private Organizations: Implications of Distinctive Contexts and Constraints , 1985 .

[2]  Robyn Thomas,et al.  Theorizing the Micro-politics of Resistance: New Public Management and Managerial Identities in the UK Public Services , 2005 .

[3]  A. Donnellon,et al.  Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. , 1986 .

[4]  M. Feldman,et al.  Order without Design: Information Production and Policy Making , 1991 .

[5]  John A. A. Sillince,et al.  A Contingency Theory of Rhetorical Congruence , 2005 .

[6]  P. Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective , 2007 .

[7]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Strategic decision making , 1992 .

[8]  Eero Vaara,et al.  The International Match: Metaphors as Vehicles of Social Identity-Building in Cross-Border Mergers , 2003 .

[9]  Eric M. Eisenberg,et al.  Strategic Ambiguities: Essays on Communication, Organization, and Identity , 2006 .

[10]  David Grant,et al.  The Sage handbook of organizational discourse , 2004 .

[11]  Robert L. Heath,et al.  Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II , 2009 .

[12]  John A. A. Sillince,et al.  Switching Strategic Perspective: The Reframing of Accounts of Responsibility , 2007 .

[13]  David D. Clarke,et al.  Ambiguities we live by: towards a pragmatics of polysemy , 2001 .

[14]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity , 1993 .

[15]  E. Eisenberg.  Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication , 1984 .

[16]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  A Rhetoric-in-Context Approach to Building Commitment to Multiple Strategic Goals , 2007 .

[17]  S. Maitlis,et al.  Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark: Understanding Failure in Organizational Strategizing , 2003 .

[18]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategic Management Upside Down: Tracking Strategies at McGill University from 1829 to 1980 , 2009 .

[19]  D. J. Wilkinson,et al.  The Ambiguity Advantage , 2006 .

[20]  S. E. Green,et al.  A Rhetorical Theory of Diffusion , 2004 .

[21]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[22]  C. Brush,et al.  Planning in Ambiguous Contexts: The Dilemma of Meeting Needs for Commitment and Demands for Legitimacy , 1996 .

[23]  J. Sillince.  A Model of the Strength and Appropriateness of Argumentation in Organizational Contexts , 2002 .

[24]  A. Glazer.  The Strategy of Candidate Ambiguity , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[25]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[26]  R. Coff.  When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power , 1999 .

[27]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Reconciling Scattered Images , 2008 .

[28]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[29]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Understanding Shifting Power Relations within and Across Organizations: A Critical Genre Analysis , 2008 .

[30]  Scott Sonenshein.  We're Changing—Or Are We? Untangling the Role of Progressive, Regressive, and Stability Narratives During Strategic Change Implementation , 2010 .

[31]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy , 2005 .

[32]  John Louis Lucaites,et al.  Contemporary rhetorical theory : a reader , 1999 .

[33]  L. Bitzer.  The Rhetorical Situation. , 1968 .

[34]  K. Burke.  A Rhetoric of Motives , 1969 .

[35]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[36]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[37]  Gina Anderson.  Mapping Academic Resistance in the Managerial University , 2008 .

[38]  Daniel J. Lair,et al.  Corporate Rhetoric as Organizational Discourse , 2004 .

[39]  Michael Tomz,et al.  The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity , 2009, American Political Science Review.

[40]  William D. Todor,et al.  Effects of Organizational Formalization on Alienation Among Professionals and Nonprofessionals , 1986 .

[41]  J. Barnes,et al.  The Complete Works of Aristotle the Revised Oxford Translation , 1984 .

[42]  E. Vaara,et al.  Strategies as Discursive Constructions: The Case of Airline Alliances , 2004 .

[43]  Mark J. Zbaracki.  The Rhetoric and Reality of Total Quality Management , 1998 .

[44]  John A. A. Sillince,et al.  Organizational Context and the Discursive Construction of Organizing , 2007 .

[45]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Good Visions, Bad Micro-management and Ugly Ambiguity: Contradictions of (Non-)Leadership in a Knowledge-Intensive Organization , 2003 .

[46]  Katherine Ramsland.  Grice and Kierkegaard: Implication and Communication , 1987 .

[47]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[48]  J. March.  Footnotes To Organizational Change , 1980 .

[49]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Justifying work: Occupational rhetorics as resources in restaurant kitchens. , 1996 .

[50]  Frank W. Lutz,et al.  Tightening up Loose Coupling in Organizations of Higher Education. , 1982 .

[51]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites , 2009 .

[52]  Eero Vaara,et al.  On the Discursive Construction of Success/Failure in Narratives of Post-Merger Integration , 2002 .

[53]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication , 1994 .

[54]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation , 2001 .

[55]  David R. Brodwin,et al.  Strategic implementation: Five approaches to an elusive phenomenon , 1984 .

[56]  A. Langley,et al.  The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations , 2001 .

[57]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Leadership and Strategic Change under Ambiguity , 1996 .

[58]  Jacob L. Mey,et al.  Context and (dis)ambiguity: a pragmatic view☆ , 2003 .

[59]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Shaping Strategy as a Structuration Process , 2008 .

[60]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[61]  Olivier Boiral,et al.  ISO 9000: Outside the Iron Cage , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[62]  R. Coff,et al.  Bidding Wars Over R&D Intensive Firms: Knowledge, Opportunism and the Market for Corporate Control , 2003 .

[63]  D. J. Wilkinson,et al.  The Ambiguity Advantage: What Great Leaders are Great At , 2006 .

[64]  Zvika Neeman,et al.  Strategic Ambiguity in Electoral Competition , 2000 .

[65]  J. Sillince,et al.  The Constitution of Organizational Legitimacy: A Narrative Perspective , 2007 .

[66]  K. Shepsle.  The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[67]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Top Teams and Strategy in a UK University , 2002 .

[68]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[69]  Michael X Cohen.  Leadership and ambiguity: the American college president, , 1974 .

[70]  E. Eisenberg,et al.  Organizational Communication: Balancing Creativity and Constraint , 1997 .

[71]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on New Forms of Organising. , 1998 .

[72]  J. Hendry.  Strategic Decision Mking, Discourse, And Strategy As Social Practice , 2000 .

[73]  Karen Locke,et al.  Perspective - Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[74]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  A Tale of Three Discourses: The Dominant, the Strategic and the Marginalized , 2006 .

[75]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The Innovating organization , 1965 .

[76]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[77]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[78]  Elin Fredsted,et al.  On semantic and pragmatic ambiguity , 1998 .

[79]  R. Evered,et al.  Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: “Inquiry from the Inside” and “Inquiry from the Outside” , 1981 .

[80]  Rodney H. Jones,et al.  Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach , 1994 .

[81]  M. Alvesson.  Knowledge Work: Ambiguity, Image and Identity , 2001 .

[82]  George Cheney,et al.  Rhetoric in an organizational society : managing multiple identities , 1992 .

[83]  Sally Davenport,et al.  Circuits of Power in Practice: Strategic Ambiguity as Delegation of Authority , 2005 .

[84]  Henry Mintzberg.  Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[85]  T. Pollock,et al.  A Grammar of Motives. , 1945 .

[86]  Wayne Eastman,et al.  Mediating the Fact-Value Antinomy: Patterns in Managerial and Legal Rhetoric, 1890-1990 , 1998 .

[87]  Robert Jackall,et al.  Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers , 1988 .