Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.

PURPOSE To assess the incremental value of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging over T2-weighted MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer detection and to investigate the use of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to characterize tumor aggressiveness, with whole-mount step-section pathologic analysis as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Internal Review Board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study and waived informed consent. Fifty-one patients with prostate cancer (median age, 58 years; range, 46-74 years) underwent T2-weighted MR imaging and DW MR imaging (b values: 0 and 700 sec/mm(2) [n = 20] or 0 and 1000 sec/mm(2) [n = 31]) followed by prostatectomy. The prostate was divided into 12 regions; two readers provided a score for each region according to their level of suspicion for the presence of cancer on a five-point scale, first using T2-weighted MR imaging alone and then using T2-weighted MR imaging and the ADC map in conjunction. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were estimated to evaluate performance. Generalized estimating equations were used to test the ADC difference between benign and malignant prostate regions and the association between ADCs and tumor Gleason scores. RESULTS For tumor detection, the AUCs for readers 1 and 2 were 0.79 and 0.76, respectively, for T2-weighted MR imaging and 0.79 and 0.78, respectively, for T2-weighted MR imaging plus the ADC map. Mean ADCs for both cancerous and healthy prostatic regions were lower when DW MR imaging was performed with a b value of 1000 sec/mm(2) rather than 700 sec/mm(2). Regardless of the b value used, there was a significant difference in the mean ADC between malignant and benign prostate regions. A lower mean ADC was significantly associated with a higher tumor Gleason score (mean ADCs of [1.21, 1.10, 0.87, and 0.69] × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec were associated with Gleason score of 3 + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, and 8 or higher, respectively; P = .017). CONCLUSION Combined DW and T2-weighted MR imaging had similar performance to T2-weighted MR imaging alone for tumor detection; however, DW MR imaging provided additional quantitative information that significantly correlated with prostate cancer aggressiveness.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  Gary P Liney,et al.  Correlation of ADC and T2 Measurements With Cell Density in Prostate Cancer at 3.0 Tesla , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[3]  H. Shinmoto,et al.  Prostate cancer screening: The clinical value of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  B. Issa,et al.  In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo‐planar imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Byung Kwan Park,et al.  Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Location at 3T Using a Phased-Array Coil: Preliminary Results , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Kazuro Sugimura,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI: Comparison of diffusion‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI in combination with T2‐weighted imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. , 1997, Biometrics.

[8]  B. K. Park,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Prostate at 3 T for Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Tissue in Transition and Peripheral Zones: Preliminary Results , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  Deanna L Langer,et al.  Intermixed normal tissue within prostate cancer: effect on MR imaging measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2--sparse versus dense cancers. , 2008, Radiology.

[10]  Peter L Choyke,et al.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. , 2007, Radiology.

[11]  Fernando J. Kim,et al.  Combined T 2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer , 2007 .

[12]  佐藤 千峰,et al.  Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate , 2006 .

[13]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[14]  N M deSouza,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[15]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Bias, underestimation of risk, and loss of statistical power in patient-level analyses of lesion detection , 2010, European Radiology.

[17]  A. Feinstein Invidious comparisons and unmet clinical challenges. , 1992, The American journal of medicine.

[18]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[19]  S. Okuda,et al.  Prostate cancer screening : The clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging , 2005 .

[20]  Masoom A Haider,et al.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Amita Shukla-Dave,et al.  The role of MRI and MRSI in diagnosis, treatment selection, and post-treatment follow-up for prostate cancer. , 2009, Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O.

[22]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue at 3.0T , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  P. Carroll,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future , 2008, Current opinion in urology.

[24]  Oguz Akin,et al.  Multimodality magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[25]  W. Fair,et al.  Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[26]  Kyung Ah Kim,et al.  Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection--a multireader study. , 2009, Radiology.

[27]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Diffusion Imaging of the Prostate at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[28]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. , 1968 .

[29]  M. Kattan,et al.  Correlation of proton MR spectroscopic imaging with gleason score based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy. , 2005, Radiology.

[30]  K. Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Endorectal diffusion‐weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  K Kuppusamy,et al.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of adult brain: image contrast and apparent diffusion coefficient map features. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[32]  M. Recio Diffusion-Weighted MRI at 3 T for the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer , 2013 .

[33]  N. D. de Souza,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[34]  Oguz Akin,et al.  Imaging of prostate cancer. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[35]  H. Hricak,et al.  Imaging of prostate cancer. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[36]  Takeo Ishigaki,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with 3-T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[37]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy: experienced versus less experienced readers. , 2005, Radiology.

[38]  J. Machan,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[40]  M. Pepe,et al.  Comparisons of Predictive Values of Binary Medical Diagnostic Tests for Paired Designs , 2000, Biometrics.

[41]  William Wells,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. , 2003, Medical physics.

[42]  Katsuyoshi Ito,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: Comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.