Modelling of impact of water quality on recharging rate of storm water filter system using various kernel function based regression

In this paper, recharging rate of stormwater filter system is assessed by using predictive models of Gaussian Process (GP) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). Four kernel functions: normalized poly kernel, polynomial kernel, Pearson VII kernel (PUK) and radial basis kernel (RBF) were used with both modelling approaches (GP and SVM). A dataset consists of 678 measurements was collected from the experimental investigations on the infiltration of the storm-water filter system. Out of 678 observations, randomly selected 462 observations were used for training, whereas remaining 216 were used for testing the model. Input variables were comprise of cumulative time (T), the thickness of medium sand bed (B), size of medium sand (S) and concentration of impurities (Conc.), whereas the recharging rate (R) was considered as output. Correlation coefficient (C.C) and root mean square error (RMSE) were used to compare the performance of both modelling approaches. The evaluation of result suggests that Pearson VII based GP regression approach works well as compared to the other kernel functions based on GP and SVM models. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the size of medium sand (S) is an important parameter for predicting the recharging rate of stormwater filter system. Parametric study outcomes suggested that the higher size of medium sand increases the recharging rate, and a higher concentration of impurities in water decreases the recharging rate. Moreover, on expanding the thickness of the medium sand bed the recharging rate of the storm water filter system was observed to be increased.

[1]  S Barraud,et al.  Long-term hydraulic and pollution retention performance of infiltration systems. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  N. K. Tiwari,et al.  Modelling of infiltration of sandy soil using gaussian process regression , 2017, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment.

[3]  S. Ambast,et al.  Artificial Groundwater Recharge through Recharge Tube Wells: A Case Study , 2003 .

[4]  Tahir Husain,et al.  Performance evaluation of slow sand filters using fuzzy rule-based modelling , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  S. Farooq,et al.  Slow sand filtration of secondary effluent , 1993 .

[6]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Comparative evaluation of numerical model and artificial neural network for simulating groundwater flow in Kathajodi–Surua Inter-basin of Odisha, India , 2013 .

[7]  Shengzhi Huang,et al.  Monthly streamflow prediction using modified EMD-based support vector machine , 2014 .

[8]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[9]  A Deletic,et al.  Clogging of stormwater gravel infiltration systems and filters: insights from a laboratory study. , 2007, Water research.

[10]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[11]  Parveen Sihag,et al.  Modelling of impact of water quality on infiltration rate of soil by random forest regression , 2017, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment.

[12]  N. K. Tiwari,et al.  Plunging hollow jet aerators - oxygen transfer and modelling , 2018 .

[13]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[14]  Yufeng Ren,et al.  Monthly Mean Streamflow Prediction Based on Bat Algorithm-Support Vector Machine , 2016 .

[15]  N. K. Tiwari,et al.  Prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using adaptive neuro- fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) , 2019 .

[16]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  A wavelet-support vector machine conjunction model for monthly streamflow forecasting , 2011 .

[17]  Malte Kuß,et al.  Gaussian process models for robust regression, classification, and reinforcement learning , 2006 .

[18]  K. Langenbach Slow sand filtration of secondary effluent for wastewater reuse: Evaluation of performance and modeling of bacteria removal , 2009 .