Computer model for the cardiovascular system: development of an e-learning tool for teaching of medical students

BackgroundThis study combined themes in cardiovascular modelling, clinical cardiology and e-learning to create an on-line environment that would assist undergraduate medical students in understanding key physiological and pathophysiological processes in the cardiovascular system.MethodsAn interactive on-line environment was developed incorporating a lumped-parameter mathematical model of the human cardiovascular system. The model outputs were used to characterise the progression of key disease processes and allowed students to classify disease severity with the aim of improving their understanding of abnormal physiology in a clinical context. Access to the on-line environment was offered to students at all stages of undergraduate training as an adjunct to routine lectures and tutorials in cardiac pathophysiology. Student feedback was collected on this novel on-line material in the course of routine audits of teaching delivery.ResultsMedical students, irrespective of their stage of undergraduate training, reported that they found the models and the environment interesting and a positive experience. After exposure to the environment, there was a statistically significant improvement in student performance on a series of 6 questions based on cardiovascular medicine, with a 33% and 22% increase in the number of questions answered correctly, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001 respectively.ConclusionsConsiderable improvement was found in students’ knowledge and understanding during assessment after exposure to the e-learning environment. Opportunities exist for development of similar environments in other fields of medicine, refinement of the existing environment and further engagement with student cohorts. This work combines some exciting and developing fields in medical education, but routine adoption of these types of tool will be possible only with the engagement of all stake-holders, from educationalists, clinicians, modellers to, most importantly, medical students.

[1]  Yutaka Kagaya,et al.  Variation in effectiveness of a cardiac auscultation training class with a cardiology patient simulator among heart sounds and murmurs. , 2017, Journal of cardiology.

[2]  A. Pinto,et al.  E-learning tools for education: regulatory aspects, current applications in radiology and future prospects , 2008, La radiologia medica.

[3]  Uno Fors,et al.  Bmc Medical Education Evaluation of an Interactive Case Simulation System in Dermatology and Venereology for Medical Students , 2022 .

[4]  Yubing Shi,et al.  Review of Zero-D and 1-D Models of Blood Flow in the Cardiovascular System , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[5]  J. Vincent,et al.  Management of bleeding following major trauma: an updated European guideline , 2010, Critical care.

[6]  K. Naka,et al.  Medical students approaches to learning before and after the cardiology problem-based learning practice , 2014 .

[7]  T. M. FISCHER,et al.  A circulation model for teaching fluid dynamics in laboratory courses in physiology , 1987, Medical education.

[8]  A. Mainous,et al.  Simulation-Based Teaching to Improve Cardiovascular Exam Skills Performance Among Third-Year Medical Students , 2011, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[9]  Simone Manini,et al.  A Framework for Different Levels of Integration of Computational Models Into Web-Based Virtual Patients , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  P. Ranasinghe,et al.  Neurophobia among medical students and non-specialist doctors in Sri Lanka , 2013, BMC medical education.

[11]  L. A. Bonet,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 , 2012, Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir.

[12]  Theo Arts,et al.  The application of complex research simulation models in education; A generic approach , 2011, 2011 Computing in Cardiology.

[13]  W. McGaghie,et al.  Implementation of a four-year multimedia computer curriculum in cardiology at six medical schools. , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[14]  Jamie Brown,et al.  Summative assessments are more powerful drivers of student learning than resource intensive teaching formats , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[15]  Benjamin W Wormald,et al.  Assessment drives learning: An unavoidable truth? , 2009, Anatomical sciences education.

[16]  P. Ganguly,et al.  Evaluation of the teaching strategy of cardiovascular system in a problem-based curriculum: student perception. , 2004, Advances in physiology education.

[17]  S. Solheim,et al.  Training auscultatory skills: computer simulated heart sounds or additional bedside training? A randomized trial on third-year medical students , 2010, BMC medical education.

[18]  M. Snaith,et al.  Comparing and contrasting undergraduate competence in musculoskeletal medicine with cardiovascular medicine and neurology. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[19]  A. Briasoulis,et al.  Effectiveness of current teaching methods in Cardiology: the SKILLS (medical Students Knowledge Integration of Lower Level clinical Skills) study. , 2013, Hippokratia.

[20]  Theodosios Korakianitis,et al.  A concentrated parameter model for the human cardiovascular system including heart valve dynamics and atrioventricular interaction. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[21]  M. Hołda,et al.  Competency in ECG Interpretation Among Medical Students , 2015, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[22]  A P Choules,et al.  The use of elearning in medical education: a review of the current situation , 2007, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[23]  A. Dhar,et al.  National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence , 2005 .

[24]  A. Gallagher,et al.  The future of simulation technologies for complex cardiovascular procedures. , 2012, European heart journal.

[25]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[26]  Andrzej A. Kononowicz,et al.  Virtual patients - what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education , 2015, BMC Medical Education.

[27]  Marc Broudo,et al.  MEDICOL: online learning in medicine and dentistry. , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[28]  Andrzej A. Kononowicz,et al.  A qualitative analysis of virtual patient descriptions in healthcare education based on a systematic literature review , 2016, BMC Medical Education.

[29]  K. Lonka,et al.  Learning in a web-based system in medical education. , 2005, Medical teacher.

[30]  Elena Svirko,et al.  Attitudes to e-learning, learning style and achievement in learning neuroanatomy by medical students , 2008, Medical teacher.

[31]  Cardiac auscultation via simulation: a survey of the approach of UK medical schools , 2015, BMC Research Notes.

[32]  K. Abbasi,et al.  BMJ Learning , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  UNDERSTANDING OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHENOMENA IN MEDICAL STUDENTS , 2010 .

[34]  Patricia Lawford,et al.  Closing the Loop: Modelling of Heart Failure Progression from Health to End-Stage Using a Meta-Analysis of Left Ventricular Pressure-Volume Loops , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  A. Stagnaro-Green,et al.  Competency in Electrocardiogram Interpretation Among Graduating Medical Students , 2014, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[36]  Kyong-Jee Kim,et al.  Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: benefits and challenges , 2014, BMC medical education.

[37]  G. Plotnick,et al.  Confidential Testing of Cardiac Examination Competency in Cardiology and Noncardiology Faculty and Trainees: A Multicenter Study , 2010, Clinical cardiology.