Revealing the Radial Effect on Orientation Discrimination by Manual Reaction Time

It has been shown that the sensitivity and accuracy of orientation perception in the periphery is significantly better when the orientations are radial with respect to the fixation point than when they are tangential. However, since perception and action may be dissociated, it is unclear whether the perceptual radial effect has a counterpart in reaction time (RT) of motor responses. Furthermore, it is unknown whether or how stimulus-response-compatibility (SRC) effect interacts with the radial effect to determine RT. To address these questions, we measured subjects' manual RT to grating stimuli that appeared across upper visual field (VF). We found that (1) RTs were significantly shorter when a grating was oriented closer to the radial direction than when it was oriented closer to the tangential direction even though the perceptual accuracies for the more radial and more tangential orientations were not significantly different under our experimental condition; (2) This RT version of the radial effect was larger in the left VF than in the right VF; (3) The radial effect and SRC effect interacted with each other to determine the overall RT. These results suggest that the RT radial effect reported here is not a passive reflection of the radial effect in perceptual accuracy, but instead, represents different processing time of radial and tangential orientations along the sensorimotor pathway.

[1]  K. Heilman,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Wim Vanduffel,et al.  The Radial Bias: A Different Slant on Visual Orientation Sensitivity in Human and Nonhuman Primates , 2006, Neuron.

[3]  D. W. Watkins,et al.  Grating visibility as a function of orientation and retinal eccentricity , 1975, Vision Research.

[4]  Michael S Gazzaniga,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for simple visual judgments in the split brain , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  P. Boulinguez,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry for trajectory perception. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  P. Corballis Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  Peng Xu,et al.  A physiological theory of depth perception from vertical disparity , 2003, Vision Research.

[11]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Structural basis of orientation sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  PAUL M. FITTS,et al.  S-R COMPATIBILITY : SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS STIMULUS AND RESPONSE , 2004 .

[13]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Is there a generalized right hemisphere dominance for mediating cerebral activation? Evidence from a choice reaction experiment with lateralized simple warning stimuli , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  B. Hommel The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[15]  Mingsha Zhang,et al.  Asymmetric Influence of Egocentric Representation onto Allocentric Perception , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Stimulus-response compatibility for left-right discriminations as a function of stimulus position. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M. Goodale How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for temporal information processing: Transient detection versus sustained monitoring , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  M. Banks,et al.  The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[20]  N. Qian,et al.  Sites of overt and covert attention define simultaneous spatial reference centers for visuomotor response , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  W. Levick,et al.  Analysis of orientation bias in cat retina , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[23]  S. Appelle Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  G. J. van der Wildt,et al.  Contrast sensitivity as a function of position on the retina , 1980, Vision Research.

[25]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries , 2000, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[27]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[28]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell dendritic fields in old-world monkeys are oriented radially , 1986, Brain Research.

[29]  R. Szczepanowski,et al.  Space positional and motion SRC effects: A comparison with the use of reaction time distribution analysis , 2013, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[30]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Stronger interference from distractors in the right hemifield during visual search , 2018, Laterality.

[31]  J Rovamo,et al.  Resolution of gratings oriented along and across meridians in peripheral vision. , 1982, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  C. Furmanski,et al.  An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  The distribution of preferred orientations in the peripheral visual field , 2003, Vision Research.

[34]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.