Evaluation of Car Seat Using Reliable and Valid Vehicle Seat Discomfort Survey

Subjective evaluation has always been regarded as a branch of social science research. Hence, in scientific and especially engineering points of view, its development is always taken for granted despite the importance of its effects on the design and development decisions. In the past, at least two automotive seat survey questionnaires have been developed with high statistical validity and reliability. Nonetheless, both were not local while subjective perception very much depends on demographic background factors. It is felt that since vehicle seat comfort is an important aspect in a seat design, a local sense should be put into the survey that is used as the subjective tool. The proposed vehicle seat discomfort survey questionnaire was developed in dual languages; English and Malay. Malay language is the national language of Malaysia, where the survey was tested. Beside inputs from literatures, key informant interviews helped in establishing the appropriate terms used as survey items. Three experimental runs on two different seats by 22 paid subjects showed that the developed questionnaire is reliable and valid. Furthermore, criterion validity analysis on the survey and previously developed survey showed significant correlation at 0.01 significance level.

[1]  M Kolich,et al.  Ergonomics modelling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort , 2004, Ergonomics.

[2]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[3]  J. Annett Subjective rating scales: science or art? , 2002, Ergonomics.

[4]  T.Y. Lim,et al.  The CATER approach to vehicle mass customization , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[5]  Wenqi Shen,et al.  Validity and reliability of rating scales for seated pressure discomfort , 1997 .

[6]  Toshiyuki Matsumoto,et al.  A Proposal for Prototype-Free Production Preparation Processes Utilizing 3DCG Animations , 2009 .

[7]  R.J. Jiao,et al.  Citarasa driven vehicle configurator , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[8]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development , 1995 .

[9]  Eiji Toba,et al.  Measurement and evaluation of sitting comfort of automotive seat , 1998, IMTC/98 Conference Proceedings. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Where Instrumentation is Going (Cat. No.98CH36222).

[10]  Álvaro Page,et al.  Functional Data Analysis as a Tool to Find Discomfort Evolution Patterns in Passenger Car Seats , 2006 .

[11]  F R Brigham,et al.  Some quantitative considerations in questionnaire design and analysis. , 1975, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  David M. Andrews,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Automotive Seating Discomfort Questionnaire (ASDQ) , 2006 .

[13]  T.Y. Lim,et al.  Citarasa based vehicle planning system , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[14]  M G Helander,et al.  Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[15]  C G Drury,et al.  A methodology for chair evaluation. , 1982, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  J. Jiao,et al.  Analytical modeling and evaluation of customer citarasa in vehicle design , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[17]  Virendra Tewari,et al.  Seating discomfort for tractor operators – a critical review , 2000 .

[18]  M. Kolich,et al.  Reliability and validity of a long term survey for automobile seat comfort , 2004 .

[19]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Distribution of Automobile Trip Durations for Studies of Seat Comfort , 1996 .

[20]  D Ng,et al.  Evaluation of an intelligent seat system. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[21]  C G Drury,et al.  Evaluation of a forward-sloping chair. , 1985, Applied ergonomics.