Scientific Practices in Elementary Classrooms: Third-Grade Students' Scientific Explanations for Seed Structure and Function

Elementary science standards emphasize that students should develop conceptual understanding of the characteristics and life cycles of plants (National Research Council, 2012), yet few studies have focused on early learners’ reasoning about seed structure and function. The purpose of this study is twofold: to (a) examine third-grade students’ formulation of explanations about seed structure and function within the context of a commercially published science unit and (b) examine their teachers’ ideas about and instructional practices to support students’ formulation of scientific explanations. Data, collected around a long-term plant investigation, included classroom observations, teacher interviews, and students’ written artifacts. Study findings suggest a link between the teachers’ ideas about scientific explanations, their instructional scaffolding, and students’ written explanations. Teachers who emphasized a single “correct explanation” rarely supported their students’ explanation-construction, either through discourse or writing. However, one teacher emphasized the importance of each student generating his/her own explanation and more frequently supported students to do so in the classroom. The evidentiary basis of her students’ written explanations was found to be much stronger than those from students in the other two classrooms. Overall, these findings indicate that teachers’ conceptions about scientific explanations are crucial to their instructional practices, which may in turn impact students’ explanation-construction.

[1]  Corinne Zimmerman The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills in Elementary and Middle School. , 2007 .

[2]  P. Tamir,et al.  Growth patterns in students' ability to supply scientific explanations : findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study in Israel , 1999 .

[3]  R. Horwood Explanation and description in science teaching , 1988 .

[4]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[5]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  Can Middle-School Science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life Science , 2004 .

[6]  E. Stern,et al.  Effects of instructional support within constructivist learning environments for elementary school students' understanding of "floating and sinking." , 2006 .

[7]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .

[8]  S. Tunnicliffe,et al.  What Plants and Animals Do Early Childhood and Primary Students’ Name? Where Do They See Them? , 2011 .

[9]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Investigating Teacher Learning Supports in High School Biology Curricular Programs to Inform the Design of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2009 .

[10]  Charles R. Barman,et al.  Students' Ideas About Plants & Plant Growth , 2006 .

[11]  Elisabeth E. Schussler,et al.  From Flowers to Fruits: How children’s books represent plant reproduction , 2008 .

[12]  Examining Children's Models of Seed , 2002 .

[13]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation , 2012 .

[14]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Do Students Need to Be Taught How to Reason , 2009 .

[15]  Laura Zangori,et al.  Elementary Teachers' Curriculum Design and Pedagogical Reasoning for Supporting Students' Comparison and Evaluation of Evidence-Based Explanations , 2013, The Elementary School Journal.

[16]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Fostering Second Graders' Scientific Explanations: A Beginning Elementary Teacher's Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practice , 2008 .

[17]  Shirley J. Magnusson,et al.  Teacher, Text, and Experience: A Case of Young Children's Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .

[18]  Kathleen E. Metz Narrowing the Gulf between the Practices of Science and the Elementary School Science Classroom , 2008, The Elementary School Journal.

[19]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1999 .

[20]  J. Remillard Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .

[21]  L. Schauble,et al.  The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. , 1996 .

[22]  Noel Enyedy,et al.  Inquiry in Interaction: How Local Adaptations of Curricula Shape Classroom Communities , 2004 .

[23]  E. Davis,et al.  BEGINNING ELEMENTARY TEACHERS' BELIEFS ABOUT THE USE OF ANCHORING QUESTIONS IN SCIENCE: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 2010 .

[24]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Introducing talk and writing for conceptual change: a classroom study , 2001 .

[25]  Laura Zangori,et al.  Fostering student sense making in elementary science learning environments: Elementary teachers' use of science curriculum materials to promote explanation construction , 2013 .

[26]  Iris Tabak,et al.  Synergy: A Complement to Emerging Patterns of Distributed Scaffolding , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[27]  Investigating Essential Characteristics of Scientific Practices in Elementary Science Learning Environments: The Practices of Science Observation Protocol (P‐SOP) , 2013 .

[28]  Kathleen E. Metz Elementary school teachers as ``targets and agents of change'': Teachers' learning in interaction with reform science curriculum , 2009 .

[29]  P. Canal Photosynthesis and 'inverse respiration' in plants: an inevitable misconception? , 1999 .

[30]  M. Windschitl,et al.  Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education , 2011 .

[31]  James H. Wandersee,et al.  Preventing Plant Blindness , 1999 .