The association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events by age and frailty: A cohort study

BACKGROUND Antihypertensives are effective at reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, but limited data exist quantifying their association with serious adverse events, particularly in older people with frailty. This study aimed to examine this association using nationally representative electronic health record data. METHODS AND FINDINGS This was a retrospective cohort study utilising linked data from 1,256 general practices across England held within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2018. Included patients were aged 40+ years, with a systolic blood pressure reading between 130 and 179 mm Hg, and not previously prescribed antihypertensive treatment. The main exposure was defined as a first prescription of antihypertensive treatment. The primary outcome was hospitalisation or death within 10 years from falls. Secondary outcomes were hypotension, syncope, fractures, acute kidney injury, electrolyte abnormalities, and primary care attendance with gout. The association between treatment and these serious adverse events was examined by Cox regression adjusted for propensity score. This propensity score was generated from a multivariable logistic regression model with patient characteristics, medical history and medication prescriptions as covariates, and new antihypertensive treatment as the outcome. Subgroup analyses were undertaken by age and frailty. Of 3,834,056 patients followed for a median of 7.1 years, 484,187 (12.6%) were prescribed new antihypertensive treatment in the 12 months before the index date (baseline). Antihypertensives were associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation or death from falls (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 1.26), hypotension (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.35), syncope (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.22), acute kidney injury (aHR 1.44, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.47), electrolyte abnormalities (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.48), and primary care attendance with gout (aHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.37). The absolute risk of serious adverse events with treatment was very low, with 6 fall events per 10,000 patients treated per year. In older patients (80 to 89 years) and those with severe frailty, this absolute risk was increased, with 61 and 84 fall events per 10,000 patients treated per year (respectively). Findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses using different approaches to address confounding and taking into account the competing risk of death. A strength of this analysis is that it provides evidence regarding the association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events, in a population of patients more representative than those enrolled in previous randomised controlled trials. Although treatment effect estimates fell within the 95% CIs of those from such trials, these analyses were observational in nature and so bias from unmeasured confounding cannot be ruled out. CONCLUSIONS Antihypertensive treatment was associated with serious adverse events. Overall, the absolute risk of this harm was low, with the exception of older patients and those with moderate to severe frailty, where the risks were similar to the likelihood of benefit from treatment. In these populations, physicians may want to consider alternative approaches to management of blood pressure and refrain from prescribing new treatment.

[1]  R. Riley,et al.  Predicting the risk of acute kidney injury in primary care: derivation and validation of STRATIFY-AKI , 2023, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[2]  J. Gladman,et al.  Development and external validation of a risk prediction model for falls in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment: retrospective cohort study , 2022, BMJ.

[3]  Rod Jackson,et al.  Time to remove hypertension from our vocabulary? , 2021, The Lancet.

[4]  R. Collins,et al.  Age-stratified and blood-pressure-stratified effects of blood-pressure-lowering pharmacotherapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis , 2021, The Lancet.

[5]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Observed and expected serious adverse event rates in randomised clinical trials for hypertension: an observational study comparing trials that do and do not focus on older people , 2021, The Lancet. Healthy longevity.

[6]  R. Payne,et al.  Association between antihypertensive treatment and adverse events: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, BMJ.

[7]  R. Payne,et al.  Generalizability of Blood Pressure Lowering Trials to Older Patients: Cross‐Sectional Analysis , 2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  T. Strandberg,et al.  Hypertension Management in Older and Frail Older Patients , 2019, Circulation research.

[9]  Darren Lunn,et al.  Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum , 2019, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  R. Stevens,et al.  Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension , 2018, JAMA internal medicine.

[11]  G. Lip,et al.  2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. , 2018, European heart journal.

[12]  Mark Latt,et al.  Association Between Chronic or Acute Use of Antihypertensive Class of Medications and Falls in Older Adults. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, American journal of hypertension.

[13]  R. Brook,et al.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2018, Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : JASH.

[14]  A. Carvajal,et al.  Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis , 2017, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[15]  D. Kansagara,et al.  Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  Lenore J Launer,et al.  Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[17]  A. Dominiczak,et al.  An Expert Opinion From the European Society of Hypertension-European Union Geriatric Medicine Society Working Group on the Management of Hypertension in Very Old, Frail Subjects. , 2016, Hypertension.

[18]  S. Anderson,et al.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, The Lancet.

[19]  John Young,et al.  Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data , 2016, Age and ageing.

[20]  Paul Gallagher,et al.  Predicting risk of adverse drug reactions in older adults , 2016, Therapeutic advances in drug safety.

[21]  Lena Osterhagen,et al.  Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys , 2016 .

[22]  Emily C. O'Brien,et al.  The ORBIT bleeding score: a simple bedside score to assess bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation , 2015, European heart journal.

[23]  K. Bhaskaran,et al.  Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[24]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Antihypertensive medications and serious fall injuries in a nationally representative sample of older adults. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[25]  G. Lip,et al.  Use of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED Scores to Aid Decision Making for Thromboprophylaxis in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation , 2012, Circulation.

[26]  L. Trinquart,et al.  Underrepresentation of Elderly People in Randomised Controlled Trials. The Example of Trials of 4 Widely Prescribed Drugs , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  Sarah Lewis,et al.  Risk of falls associated with antihypertensive medication: population-based case-control study. , 2010, Age and ageing.

[28]  Gregory Y H Lip,et al.  Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Chest.

[29]  M. Etminan,et al.  Effects of antihypertensive drug treatments on fracture outcomes: a meta‐analysis of observational studies , 2006, Journal of internal medicine.

[30]  D. Rubin,et al.  Estimation of the causal effect of a time-varying exposure on the marginal mean of a repeated binary outcome. Commentary. Authors' reply , 1999 .

[31]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Impact of gait problems and falls on functioning in independent living persons of 55 years and over: a community survey. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[32]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.