O Peer, Where Art Thou? Uncovering Remote Peering Interconnections at IXPs

Internet eXchange Points (IXPs) are Internet hubs that mainly provide the switching infrastructure to interconnect networks and exchange traffic. While the initial goal of IXPs was to bring together networks residing in the same city or country, and thus keep local traffic local, this model is gradually shifting. Many networks connect to IXPs without having physical presence at their switching infrastructure. This practice, called Remote Peering, is changing the Internet topology and economy, and has become the subject of a contentious debate within the network operators’ community. However, despite the increasing attention it attracts, the understanding of the characteristics and impact of remote peering is limited. In this work, we introduce and validate a heuristic methodology for discovering remote peers at IXPs. We (i) identify critical remote peering inference challenges, (ii) infer remote peers with high accuracy (>97%) and coverage (94%) per IXP, and (iii) characterize different aspects of the remote peering ecosystem by applying our methodology to 30 large IXPs. We observe that remote peering is a significantly common practice in all the studied IXPs; for the largest IXPs, remote peers account for 40% of their member base. We also show that today, IXP growth is mainly driven by remote peering, which contributes two times more than local peering.

[1]  Keeping the Internet up and running in times of crisis , 2020, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19).

[2]  Alberto Dainotti,et al.  Towards passive analysis of anycast in global routing: unintended impact of remote peering , 2019, CCRV.

[3]  Xenofontas Dimitropoulos,et al.  Detecting Network Disruptions At Colocation Facilities , 2019, IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[4]  Nikolaos Laoutaris,et al.  Tracing Cross Border Web Tracking , 2018, Internet Measurement Conference.

[5]  Brian Trammell,et al.  Revisiting the Privacy Implications of Two-Way Internet Latency Data , 2018, PAM.

[6]  Steve Uhlig,et al.  Open Connect Everywhere: A Glimpse at the Internet Ecosystem through the Lens of the Netflix CDN , 2016, CCRV.

[7]  Amogh Dhamdhere,et al.  Investigating the causes of congestion on the African IXP substrate , 2017, Internet Measurement Conference.

[8]  Zubair Shafiq,et al.  Peering vs. transit: Performance comparison of peering and transit interconnections , 2017, 2017 IEEE 25th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP).

[9]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Detecting Peering Infrastructure Outages in the Wild , 2017, SIGCOMM.

[10]  Steve Uhlig,et al.  A Hypergiant ’ s View of the Internet Timm Böttger , 2017 .

[11]  Jonathan M. Smith,et al.  MAP-IT: Multipass Accurate Passive Inferences from Traceroute , 2016, Internet Measurement Conference.

[12]  David D. Clark,et al.  bdrmap: Inference of Borders Between IP Networks , 2016, Internet Measurement Conference.

[13]  Vasileios Giotsas,et al.  Periscope: Unifying Looking Glass Querying , 2016, PAM.

[14]  Xenofontas A. Dimitropoulos,et al.  traIXroute: Detecting IXPs in traceroute paths , 2016, PAM.

[15]  Georgios Smaragdakis,et al.  Content may be King, but (Peering) Location matters: A Progress Report on the Evolution of Content Delivery in the Internet , 2016 .

[16]  Vasileios Giotsas,et al.  Mapping peering interconnections to a facility , 2015, CoNEXT.

[17]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Are We One Hop Away from a Better Internet? , 2015, Internet Measurement Conference.

[18]  Randy Bush,et al.  Quantifying Interference between Measurements on the RIPE Atlas Platform , 2015, Internet Measurement Conference.

[19]  Nikolaos Laoutaris,et al.  Complexities in Internet peering: Understanding the “Black” in the “Black Art” , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[20]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Quo vadis Open-IX? , 2015, CCRV.

[21]  Ignacio Castro,et al.  Remote Peering: More Peering without Internet Flattening , 2014, CoNEXT.

[22]  David D. Clark,et al.  Challenges in Inferring Internet Interdomain Congestion , 2014, Internet Measurement Conference.

[23]  Vasileios Giotsas,et al.  Inferring Complex AS Relationships , 2014, Internet Measurement Conference.

[24]  Amogh Dhamdhere,et al.  Open peering by Internet transit providers: Peer preference or peer pressure? , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[25]  Nick Feamster,et al.  Peering at the Internet's Frontier: A First Look at ISP Interconnectivity in Africa , 2014, PAM.

[26]  Vasileios Giotsas,et al.  Inferring multilateral peering , 2013, CoNEXT.

[27]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  There is more to IXPs than meets the eye , 2013, CCRV.

[28]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  On the benefits of using a large IXP as an internet vantage point , 2013, Internet Measurement Conference.

[29]  Vasileios Giotsas,et al.  AS relationships, customer cones, and validation , 2013, Internet Measurement Conference.

[30]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  On the importance of Internet eXchange Points for today's Internet ecosystem , 2013, ArXiv.

[31]  Kimberly C. Claffy,et al.  Internet-Scale IPv4 Alias Resolution With MIDAR , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[32]  Anja Feldmann,et al.  Anatomy of a large european IXP , 2012, SIGCOMM '12.

[33]  Charles F. F. Karney Algorithms for geodesics , 2011, Journal of Geodesy.

[34]  S. Uhlig,et al.  Anatomy of a large european IXP , 2012, CCRV.

[35]  Walter Willinger,et al.  10 Lessons from 10 Years of Measuring and Modeling the Internet's Autonomous Systems , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[36]  Brice Augustin,et al.  IXPs: mapped? , 2009, IMC '09.

[37]  David Wetherall,et al.  Towards IP geolocation using delay and topology measurements , 2006, IMC '06.

[38]  Jennifer Rexford,et al.  BGP routing policies in ISP networks , 2005, IEEE Network.

[39]  Walter Willinger,et al.  A first-principles approach to understanding the internet's router-level topology , 2004, SIGCOMM '04.

[40]  Renata Teixeira,et al.  Dynamics of hot-potato routing in IP networks , 2004, SIGMETRICS '04/Performance '04.

[41]  Andrew G. Mason,et al.  Cisco Secure Internet Security Solutions , 2001 .