Multi-infill strategy for kriging models used in variable fidelity optimization

Abstract In this paper, a computationally efficient optimization method for aerodynamic design has been developed. The low-fidelity model and the multi-infill strategy are utilized in this approach. Low-fidelity data is employed to provide a good global trend for model prediction, and multiple sample points chosen by different infill criteria in each updating cycle are used to enhance the exploitation and exploration ability of the optimization approach. Take the advantages of low-fidelity model and the multi-infill strategy, and no initial sample for the high-fidelity model is needed. This approach is applied to an airfoil design case and a high-dimensional wing design case. It saves a large number of high-fidelity function evaluations for initial model construction. What’s more, faster reduction of an aerodynamic function is achieved, when compared to ordinary kriging using the multi-infill strategy and variable-fidelity model using single infill criterion. The results indicate that the developed approach has a promising application to efficient aerodynamic design when high-fidelity analyses are involved.

[1]  Zhonghua Han,et al.  Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization of transonic wings using a parallel infilling strategy and surrogate models , 2016, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[2]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  Comparison of Gradient-Based and Gradient-Enhanced Response-Surface-Based Optimizers , 2010 .

[3]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[4]  B. Kulfan Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method , 2008 .

[5]  Seongim Choi,et al.  Design of Efficient Propellers Using Variable-Fidelity Aerodynamic Analysis and Multilevel Optimization , 2015 .

[6]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes , 2002 .

[7]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Experimental flapping wing optimization and uncertainty quantification using limited samples , 2015 .

[9]  Slawomir Koziel,et al.  Supersonic Airfoil Shape Optimization by Variable-fidelity Models and Manifold Mapping , 2016, ICCS.

[10]  Kazuomi Yamamoto,et al.  Efficient Optimization Design Method Using Kriging Model , 2005 .

[11]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  No free lunch theorems for optimization , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[12]  Yun Tian,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization and mechanism design of flexible variable camber trailing-edge flap , 2017 .

[13]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[14]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Hierarchical Kriging Model for Variable-Fidelity Surrogate Modeling , 2012 .

[15]  Y. Y. Huang,et al.  A surrogate-based optimization method with RBF neural network enhanced by linear interpolation and hybrid infill strategy , 2014, Optim. Methods Softw..

[16]  Quan Li,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization of rotor airfoil based on multi-layer hierarchical constraint method , 2016 .

[17]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available , 2000 .

[18]  Thomas W. Sederberg,et al.  Free-form deformation of solid geometric models , 1986, SIGGRAPH.