The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process.

Many previous studies have demonstrated that the visual N1 component is larger for attended-location stimuli than for unattended-location stimuli. This difference is observed typically only for tasks involving a discrimination of the attended-location stimuli, suggesting that the N1 wave reflects a discrimination process that is applied to the attended location. The present study tested this hypothesis by examining the N1 component elicited by attended stimuli under conditions that either required or did not require the subject to perform a discrimination. Specifically, the N1 elicited by foveal stimuli during choice-reaction time (RT) tasks was compared with the N1 elicited by identical stimuli during simple-RT tasks. In three experiments, a larger posterior N1 was observed in choice-RT tasks than in simple-RT tasks, even when several potential confounds were eliminated (e.g., arousal and motor preparation). This N1 discrimination effect was observed even when no motor response was required and was present for both color- and form-based discriminations. Moreover, this discrimination effect was equally large for easy and difficult discriminations, arguing against a simple resource-based explanation of the present results. Instead, the results of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that the visual N1 component reflects the operation of a discrimination process within the focus of attention.

[1]  M. Russell Harter,et al.  Effects of attention and arousal on visually evoked cortical potentials and reaction time in man , 1969 .

[2]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Readiness potential, vertex positive wave, contingent negative variation and accuracy of perception. , 1971, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Fenelon,et al.  Spatial distribution of the contingent negative variation (CNV) and the relationship between CNV and reaction time. , 1975, Psychophysiology.

[4]  C. C. Wood,et al.  The ɛ-Adjustment Procedure for Repeated-Measures Analyses of Variance , 1976 .

[5]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space , 1977 .

[6]  R. Näätänen.  Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Manipulation of event-related potential manifestations of information processing stages. , 1982, Science.

[8]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[9]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[10]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Effects of the amount of stimulus information processed on negative event-related potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  M. Woldorff,et al.  Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[16]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  S J Luck,et al.  Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Multiple mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: recent evidence from human electrophysiology , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  G. Mangun.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[20]  S. Luck,et al.  The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: an electrophysiological analysis. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[21]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[23]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.