Mentalizing in economic decision-making

In the Ultimatum Game, participants typically reject monetary offers they consider unfair even if the alternative is to gain no money at all. In the present study, ERPs were recorded while subjects processed different offers of a proposer. In addition to clearly fair and unfair offers, mid-value offers which cannot be easily classified as fair or unfair and therefore involve more elaborate decision making were analyzed. A fast initial distinction between fair and other kinds of offers was reflected by amplitude of the feedback related negativity (FRN). Mid-value offers were associated with longer RTs, and a larger N350 amplitude. In addition, source analyses revealed a specific involvement of the superior temporal gyrus and the inferior parietal lobule during processing of mid-value offers compared to offers categorized clearly as fair or unfair, suggesting a contribution of mentalizing about the intention of the proposer to the decision making process. Taken together, the present findings support the idea that economic decisions are significantly affected by non-rational factors, trying to narrow the gap between formal theory and the real decisional behaviour.

[1]  F. Birklein,et al.  The unpleasantness of tonic pain is encoded by the insular cortex , 2005, Neurology.

[2]  M. Botvinick.  Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  Uta Frith,et al.  Theory of mind , 2001, Current Biology.

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Time Course of Processes and Representations Supporting Visual Object Identification and Memory , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Topographic maps, source localization inference, and the reference electrode: comments on a paper by Desmedt et al. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Alan G. Sanfey,et al.  Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  D. Schacter,et al.  Prefrontal Contributions to Executive Control: fMRI Evidence for Functional Distinctions within Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2001, NeuroImage.

[10]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Neural Predictors of Purchases , 2007, Neuron.

[11]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[12]  Vilfredo De Pascalis,et al.  The effect of temperamental traits on event-related potentials, heart rate and reaction time , 1999 .

[13]  M. Congedo,et al.  Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography neurofeedback , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  J. Decety,et al.  A PET Investigation of the Attribution of Intentions with a Nonverbal Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[17]  Mascha van 't Wout,et al.  COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGY NEUROREPORT Repetitive , 2005 .

[18]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  Daeyeol Lee.  Neural basis of quasi-rational decision making , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  Yiyuan Tang,et al.  The anterior cingulate gyrus and the mechanism of self-regulation , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  D. Tranel,et al.  Irrational Economic Decision-Making after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining , 1995 .

[23]  Martin P. Paulus,et al.  Superior temporal gyrus and insula provide response and outcome-dependent information during assessment and action selection in a decision-making situation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  Christian Bellebaum,et al.  Time course of cross-hemispheric spatial updating in the human parietal cortex , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  E. Rolls,et al.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  James K Rilling,et al.  The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  G. Fricchione.  Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[28]  R D Hare,et al.  Semantic and affective processing in psychopaths: an event-related potential (ERP) study. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Daeyeol Lee.  Neuroeconomics: making risky choices in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[31]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[32]  L. Parsons,et al.  Reciprocal limbic-cortical function and negative mood: converging PET findings in depression and normal sadness. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[33]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics , 2005 .

[34]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[38]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[39]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[40]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension , 1995, Cognition.

[41]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[42]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[43]  G. Fink,et al.  Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  I. Daum,et al.  Frontocentral negativity in electroencephalogram reflects motor response evaluation in humans on correct trials , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.