When Choice Does Not Equal Freedom

The psychological literature indicates that people prefer to choose for themselves, but this finding largely represents a middle-class American perspective. The three studies reported here test the hypothesis that, given the material and social demands of working-class contexts, a concern for others can be normative and take precedence over individual choice. Study 1 found that, compared to middle-class participants, working-class participants, who reported fewer choices at work, more often accepted a gift from an experimenter than asked to choose for themselves. In Study 2, working-class participants' descriptions of choice included fewer associations with freedom and more associations with negative affect and difficulty than middle-class participants. Finally, Study 3 found that, reflecting greater negative affect toward choice, working-class observers preferred a shirt that a confederate accepted from someone else, rather than chose for herself. Together, these studies reveal that focusing on and attending to others is often normative in working-class contexts.

[1]  Erica R. Edwards Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril Among the Black Middle Class , 2002 .

[2]  H. Markus,et al.  Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[4]  M. Lepper,et al.  Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  H. Markus,et al.  You Can ’ t Always Get What You Want : Educational Attainment , Agency , and Choice , 2005 .

[7]  Henry L. Tischler Introduction to Sociology, 5th Edition , 1996 .

[8]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  H. Markus,et al.  Why Did They “Choose” to Stay? , 2009, Psychological science.

[10]  J. Vaizey Introduction to Sociology , 1970, Nature.

[11]  Mary E Pattillo-McCoy,et al.  Black Picket Fences: Privileges and Peril among the Black Middle Class , 1999 .

[12]  M. Friedman,et al.  Free to Choose: a personal Statement , 1982 .

[13]  D. Cohen,et al.  Culture and the Structure of Personal Experience: Insider and Outsider Phenomenologies of the Self and Social World , 2007 .

[14]  Miriam David,et al.  Choices of Degree or Degrees of Choice? Class, `Race' and the Higher Education Choice Process , 2001 .

[15]  Annette Lareau Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life , 2003 .

[16]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Does Choice Mean Freedom and Well‐Being? , 2010 .

[17]  H. Markus,et al.  Models of agency: sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. , 2003, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[18]  B. Schwartz The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students : findings and insights from twenty years of research , 1992 .

[21]  E. Langer,et al.  The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  S A Stansfeld,et al.  Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in whitehall ii (prospective cohort) study , 1997, BMJ.

[23]  M. Lepper,et al.  When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? , 2000 .

[24]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  S. Heine,et al.  Toward a Psychological Science for a Cultural Species , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[26]  M. Kohn,et al.  Class and conformity : a study in values , 1970 .

[27]  Suzanne L. Weaver,et al.  The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  H. Markus,et al.  Choice as an act of meaning: the case of social class. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  M. Kohn,et al.  Work and personality : an inquiry into the impact of social stratification , 1984 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[31]  Joan G. Miller Culture and agency: implications for psychological theories of motivation and social development. , 2003, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[32]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Interdependent Agency: An Alternative System for Action. , 2005 .

[33]  Grace E. Cho,et al.  Working-Class Children’s Experience through the Prism of Personal Storytelling , 2005, Human Development.

[34]  Eric C. Newburger,et al.  The Big Payoff: Educational Attainment and Synthetic Estimates of Work-Life Earnings. Special Studies. Current Population Reports. , 2002 .

[35]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[36]  Margie E. Lachman,et al.  The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. , 1998 .