Performance of a new test strip for freestyle blood glucose monitoring systems.

BACKGROUND a new strip, designed to enhance the ease of use and minimize interference of non-glucose sugars, has been developed to replace the current FreeStyle (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) blood glucose test strip. We evaluated the performance of this new strip. METHODS laboratory evaluation included precision, linearity, dynamic range, effects of operating temperature, humidity, altitude, hematocrit, interferents, and blood reapplication. System accuracy, lay user performance, and ease of use for finger capillary blood testing and accuracy for venous blood testing were evaluated at clinics. Lay users also compared the speed and ease of use between the new strip and the current FreeStyle strip. RESULTS for glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL, 73%, 100%, and 100% of the individual capillary blood glucose results obtained by lay users fell within ± 5, 10, and 15 mg/dL, respectively, of the reference. For glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL, 68%, 95%, 99%, and 99% of the lay user results fell within  ±  5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, of the reference. Comparable accuracy was obtained in the venous blood study. Lay users found the new test strip easy to use and faster and easier to use than the current FreeStyle strip. The new strip maintained accuracy under various challenging conditions, including high concentrations of various interferents, sample reapplication up to 60 s, and extremes in hematocrit, altitude, and operating temperature and humidity. CONCLUSIONS our results demonstrated excellent accuracy of the new FreeStyle test strip and validated the improvements in minimizing interference and enhancing ease of use.

[1]  P. Richards,et al.  The practical aspects of insulin at high altitude. , 2013, High altitude medicine & biology.

[2]  I. Hirsch,et al.  Interference of home blood glucose measurements and poor outcomes: a solvable problem requiring broader exposure. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[3]  D. Dunger,et al.  Closed-loop insulin delivery for treatment of type 1 diabetes , 2011, BMC medicine.

[4]  Youqing Wang,et al.  A novel adaptive-weighted-average framework for blood glucose prediction. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[5]  J C Boyd,et al.  Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose. , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  Andreas Pfützner,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[7]  B H Ginsberg,et al.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[8]  W. Bablok,et al.  A New Biometrical Procedure for Testing the Equality of Measurements from Two Different Analytical Methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I , 1983, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[9]  G. Dimeski,et al.  Evaluation of the New OneTouch Verio Versus FreeStyle Lite Glucose Meter and the Beckman DxC800 Laboratory Analyzer , 2012 .

[10]  J. Skyler,et al.  FreeStyle: a small-volume electrochemical glucose sensor for home blood glucose testing. , 2000, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[11]  C. Burtis,et al.  Reference Information for the Clinical Laboratory , 2012 .

[12]  C. Cook,et al.  Diabetes management during travel , 2012 .

[13]  R. Rizza,et al.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose , 1994 .

[14]  Andreas Pfützner,et al.  Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices , 2012, Current medical research and opinion.

[15]  B. Ginsberg Factors Affecting Blood Glucose Monitoring: Sources of Errors in Measurement , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.