Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives

The establishment of strong alignment between information technology (IT) and organizational objectives has consistently been reported as one of the key concerns of information systems managers. This paper presents findings from a study which investigated the influence of several factors on the social dimension of alignment within 10 business units in the Canadian life insurance industry. The social dimension of alignment refers 'Lynda M. Applegate was the accepting senior editor for this paper. to the state in which business and IT executives understand and are committed to the business and IT mission, objectives, and plans. The research model included four factors that would potentially influence alignment: (1) shared domain knowledge between business and IT executives, (2) IT implementation success, (3) communication between business and IT executives, and (4) connections between business and IT planning processes. The outcome, alignment, was operationalized in two ways: the degree of mutual understanding of current objectives (shortterm alignment) and the congruence of IT vision (long-term alignment) between business and IT executives. A total of 57 semi-structured interviews were held with 45 informants. Written business and IT strategic plans, minutes from IT steering committee meetings, and other strategy documents were collected and analyzed from each of the 10 business units. All four factors in the model (shared domain knowledge, IT implementation success, communication between business and IT executives, and connections between business and IT planning) were found to influence short-term alignment. Only shared domain knowledge was found to influence long-term alignment A new factor, strategic business plans, was found to influence both short and long-term alignment. MIS Quarterly Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 81-113/March 2000 81 I~~~~~fl This content downloaded from 207.46.13.115 on Sat, 08 Oct 2016 04:53:48 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Reich & Benbasat/Alignment Between Business and IT Objectives The findings suggest that both practitioners and researchers should direct significant effort toward understanding shared domain knowledge, the factor which had the strongest influence on the alignment between IT and business executives. There is also a call for further research into the creation of an IT vision.

[1]  Si-Young Jang,et al.  Influence of organizational factors on information systems strategic planning , 1989 .

[2]  J. Rockart,et al.  EIGHT IMPERATIVES FOR THE NEW IT ORGANIZATION , 1996 .

[3]  Andrea Taylor-Cummings,et al.  Bridging the user-IS gap: a study of major information systems projects , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[5]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[6]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[7]  Mark Keil,et al.  Pulling the Plug: Software Project Management and the Problem of Project Escalation , 1995, MIS Q..

[8]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[9]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[10]  Peter Weill,et al.  Developing Business And Information Strategy Alignment: A Study In The Banking Industry , 1991, ICIS.

[11]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[13]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  A Process-oriented Assessment of the Alignment of Information Systems and Business Strategy: Implications for IT Business Value , 1999 .

[14]  Ming Zeng,et al.  The Infeasibility of Invariant Laws in Management Studies: a Reflective Dialogue in Defense of Case Studies , 1998 .

[15]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Why information systems fail , 1975 .

[16]  James A. Senn.  A Management View of Systems Analysts: Failures and Shortcomings , 1978, MIS Q..

[17]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  Key Issues in Information Systems Management: 1994-95 SIM Delphi Results , 1996, MIS Q..

[18]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[19]  S. Zahra,et al.  Integrating the Content and Process of Strategic MIS Planning with Competitive Strategy , 1991 .

[20]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Relationships between Organizational and Information Systems Objectives: Some Empirical Evidence , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  Linking Information Technology and Corporate Strategy: an Organizational View , 1986, ICIS.

[23]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Measuring the Linkage Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 1996, MIS Q..

[24]  Lynda M. Applegate,et al.  Frito-Lay, Inc.: A Strategic Transition (D) , 1992 .

[25]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Planpower, Xcon, and Mudman: an in-depth analysis into three commercial expert systems in use , 1986 .

[26]  Jeffrey E. Kottemann,et al.  Information Systems Planning and Development: Strategic Postures and Methodologies , 1984, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  William R. King,et al.  Strategic Planning for Management Information Systems , 1978, MIS Q..

[28]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  Alignment of Information Systems Plans with Business Plans:The Impact on Competitive Advantage , 1997 .

[29]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[30]  J. Horovitz,et al.  NEW PERSPECTIVES ON STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1984 .

[31]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Coping with information technology? How British executives perceive the key information systems management issues in the mid-1990s , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[32]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[33]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Is Your CIO Adding Value , 1995 .

[34]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame , 1984 .

[35]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Research in Strategic Management and Information Technology , 1994 .

[36]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1993 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHARED KNOWLEDGE TO IS GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2017 .

[37]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Fit, Simplicity and Risk: Multiple Paths to Strategic IT Change , 1995, ICIS.

[38]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[39]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Information Technology Planning in the 1990's: Directions for Practice and Research , 1987, MIS Q..

[40]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Pitfalls of Strategic Planning , 1993 .

[41]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .