Distributed approach for channel quality estimation using dedicated nodes in industrial WSN

A way to deal with the variations in the link quality of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) is the use of strategies for Dynamic Channel Allocation (DCA). The first step to perform DCA is estimating the channel quality, so that the network nodes can decide if a channel change is needed, and the best channel to be used. This paper proposes a distributed approach with nodes dedicated to monitor channel quality, by using the Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) and the Link Quality Indicator (LQI) to identify low quality channels. This approach is acceptable in industrial WSN, since the network deployment can be performed with adequate planning. Furthermore, the sensor nodes do not need to stop their operation for monitoring the channel quality. As a first step, experiments were performed in a real industrial environment to identify the relation between RSSI and LQI traces, and the Packet Error Rate for different channels, by using IEEE 802.15.4 radios operating in the 2.4 GHz band.

[1]  Kuang-Ching Wang,et al.  Channel Characterization and Link Quality Assessment of IEEE 802.15.4-Compliant Radio for Factory Environments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[2]  M. Malajner,et al.  Using RSSI value for distance estimation in wireless sensor networks based on ZigBee , 2008, 2008 15th International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing.

[3]  Luc Martens,et al.  The industrial indoor channel: large-scale and temporal fading at 900, 2400, and 5200 MHz , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  Channel selection in spectrum agile and cognitive MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks , 2010, MobiWac '10.

[5]  Carl Karlsson,et al.  Sources of disturbances on wireless communication in industrial and factory environments , 2010, 2010 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[6]  Mário Alves,et al.  Quantifying the channel quality for interference-aware wireless sensor networks , 2011, SIGBED.

[7]  Waslon T. A. Lopes,et al.  Desafios em Redes de Sensores sem Fio , 2011 .

[8]  Abel C. Lima-Filho,et al.  Embedded System Integrated Into a Wireless Sensor Network for Online Dynamic Torque and Efficiency Monitoring in Induction Motors , 2012, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[9]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Impacts of 2.4-GHz ISM Band Interference on IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Sensor Network Reliability in Buildings , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  E. Lewis,et al.  2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 channel interference classification algorithm running live on a sensor node , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sensors.

[11]  R. D. Gomes,et al.  Correlation between Spectral Occupancy and Packet Error Rate in IEEE 802.15.4-based Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012, IEEE Latin America Transactions.

[12]  Anis Koubaa,et al.  Radio link quality estimation in wireless sensor networks , 2012, ACM Trans. Sens. Networks.

[13]  Shuanhu Wu,et al.  Study and Prediction of Wireless Link Quality for Adaptive Channel Hopping , 2012, J. Networks.

[14]  JeongGil Ko,et al.  DynaChannAl: dynamic channel allocation with minimal end-to-end delay for two-tier wireless sensor networks , 2012, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[15]  Per Ängskog,et al.  Challenges and conditions for wireless machine-to-machine communications in industrial environments , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Andrzej Duda,et al.  Link quality metrics in large scale indoor wireless sensor networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[17]  Tapio Heikkilä,et al.  Identification of radio disturbances of wireless sensor networks , 2013, SummerSim.