Perception of Illumination Direction in Images of 3-D Convex Objects: Influence of Surface Materials and Light Fields

We investigated the perception of illumination direction in images of 3-D convex objects under variations of light field and surface material properties. In a first experiment, we used an illumination-matching procedure in order to measure observers' ability to estimate the direction of illumination in images of 3-D polyhedra rendered under different light fields and illumination directions. Match deviations were larger in frontal direction than in rear directions, mainly counterclockwise in azimuth component, and diverged, in elevation component, from the image plane. In a second experiment, we examined whether the direction estimate was affected by the surface material type (BRDF), the light field, and the illumination direction. Angular deviations varied with material surface type and were largest in the test elevation direction 0°. Elevation component deviations also differed with surface type and were larger in hemispherical diffuse lighting than in collimated lighting. These results suggest that the direction estimation is better with images of evenly distributed intensity gradients than with those of drastically varying gradients, and that the visual system may not take intensity variations due to the surface material or the light field into account in estimating the direction of illumination.

[1]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[2]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[3]  S. Bergström.  Common and relative components of reflected light as information about the illumination, colour, and three-dimensional form of objects. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[4]  H. Barrow,et al.  RECOVERING INTRINSIC SCENE CHARACTERISTICS FROM IMAGES , 1978 .

[5]  A. Pentland.  Finding the illuminant direction , 1982 .

[6]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Light Source Position in the Perception of Object Shape , 1983, Perception.

[7]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Steven A. Shafer,et al.  Using color to separate reflection components , 1985 .

[9]  L. Arend,et al.  Simultaneous color constancy. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  L. Arend,et al.  Simultaneous constancy, lightness, and brightness. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[12]  I P Howard,et al.  Shape from Shading in Different Frames of Reference , 1990, Perception.

[13]  M. Landy,et al.  A Bilinear Model of the Illuminant's Effect on Color Appearance , 1991 .

[14]  B. Wandell,et al.  Asymmetric color matching: how color appearance depends on the illuminant. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The perception of shading and reflectance , 1996 .

[16]  D. Kersten,et al.  Illumination, Shading and the Perception of Local Orientation , 1996, Vision Research.

[17]  William Curran,et al.  The effect of Illuminant position on perceived curvature , 1996, Vision Research.

[18]  Jun'ichiro Seyama,et al.  Shape from shading: estimation of reflectance map , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Optical properties (bidirectional reflection distribution functions) of velvet. , 1998, Applied optics.

[20]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Prior knowledge on the illumination position , 2001, Cognition.

[21]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Illumination direction from texture shading. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  The secret of velvety skin , 2003, Machine Vision and Applications.

[23]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Perception of Surface Reflectance of 3-D Geometrical Shapes: Influence of the Lighting Mode , 2003, Perception.

[24]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Bidirectional Reflection Distribution Function of Thoroughly Pitted Surfaces , 1999, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Shape constancy does not hold for images rendered with different types of material surfaces , 2004 .

[26]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of solid shape from shading , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  S. Pont,et al.  Material — Illumination Ambiguities and the Perception of Solid Objects , 2006, Perception.