Transport and CO2: Productivity Growth and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the European Commercial Transport Industry

In the last decades transport activities persistently increased in the EU27 and were strongly coupled to growth in gross domestic product. Like most production processes, they are inevitably linked with the generation of environmentally hazardous by-products, such as CO2 emissions. This leads to the question of how to promote a sustainable transport sector that meets both environmental protection targets and economic requirements. In this context, the objective of this paper is to compare the CO2-sensitve productivity development of the European commercial transport industry for the period between 1995 and 2006. We calculate a Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index to investigate the effects of country-specific regulations on productivity and to identify innovative countries. Our results show a high variation in the CO2-sensitive productivity development and a slight productivity decrease on average. Efficiency losses indicate that the majority of the countries were not able to follow the technological improvements induced by some innovative countries.

[1]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[2]  R. Färe,et al.  The law of diminishing returns , 1974 .

[3]  J. Piesse,et al.  Multi-factor agricultural productivity, efficiency and convergence in Botswana, 1981–1996 , 2003 .

[4]  William L. Weber,et al.  Does Environmental Protection Lead to Slower Productivity Growth in the Chemical Industry? , 2004 .

[5]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[6]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Productivity growth in OECD countries: A comparison with Malmquist indices , 2005 .

[7]  Ludwig Lauwers,et al.  Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition , 2007 .

[8]  Yanrui Wu,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Productivity Growth: A Study of the APEC Economies , 2007 .

[9]  R. Pethig,et al.  Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[11]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[12]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[13]  Victoria Shestalova,et al.  Sequential Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth: An Application to OECD Industrial Activities , 2003 .

[14]  R. Färe,et al.  Accounting for Air Pollution Emissions in Measures of State Manufacturing Productivity Growth , 2001 .

[15]  Robin C. Sickles,et al.  The role of environmental factors in growth accounting , 2004 .

[16]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[17]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[18]  D. Luenberger.  New optimality principles for economic efficiency and equilibrium , 1992 .

[19]  Almas Heshmati,et al.  A sequential Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index : Environmentally sensitive productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology , 2010 .

[20]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index , 2006 .

[21]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Good Modelling of Bad Outputs: Pollution and Multiple-Output Production , 2009 .

[22]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Capital and the Theory of Productivity Measurement , 2016 .

[23]  K. Abadir,et al.  Depreciation Rates and Capital Stocks , 2001 .