Investigation of an Improved Side-Vented Needle and Corresponding Irrigation Strategy for Root Canal Therapy with CFD Method

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE This research aimed to present an improved side-vented needle and explore its availability as well as the corresponding irrigation strategy. METHODS A CFD model was used to simulate the irrigant flow in a simplified prepared round root canal with an apical delta respectively with different needles for irrigation. The needle types include flat end-tip needle, original side-vented needle, and improved side-vented needle. Different insertion depths and inlet velocities were contrastively studied, as well as the gap size between the bulb at the end tip of the improved side-vented needle and the root canal. The study includes a total of 13 schemes. Velocity, pressure, and shear stress in the root canal were measured to contrast the internal flow-field details and irrigation efficiencies between different schemes. RESULTS Poor irrigation replacement appeared in the schemes without enough needle insertion no matter which kind of needle has been used, though relatively lower pressure emerged at the apical foramen. On the contrary, deepening needle insertion not only brings better irrigant replacement but also higher apical foramen pressure. The original side-vented needle tends to make lower pressure at the apical foramen and simultaneously worse irrigant replacement as compared to the flat end-tip needle. The fluid entering the apical anatomy part deceases a lot as the original side-vented needle was replaced by the improved one. The scheme using the improved side-vented needle with gap size ratio and inlet velocity respectively equaling 5.0% and 5.50m/s can be considered the best one. CONCLUSIONS The improved side-vented needle can ensure acceptable irrigant replacement performance without leading to a high-pressure level at the apical foramen. The gap between the bulb and the wall of the root canal is very crucial for the pressure at the apical. The ideal irrigation strategy is ensuring the gap equals zero. However, it is a little hard to realize during the whole procedure of the root canal preparation except the final step. Consequently, another strategy that keeping the value of gap size ratio as small as possible such as less than 15% and simultaneously ensuring lower-velocity coming fluid, is necessary in the non-final irrigation.

[1]  C. Boutsioukis,et al.  The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[2]  M. Meire,et al.  Efficacy of sonically, ultrasonically and laser‐activated irrigation in removing a biofilm‐mimicking hydrogel from an isthmus model , 2018, International endodontic journal.

[3]  Gaetano Isola,et al.  Antibiofilm Activity of Three Different Irrigation Techniques: An in Vitro Study , 2019, Antibiotics.

[4]  Yuan Gao,et al.  Development and validation of a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model of root canal irrigation. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  Leo Tjäderhane,et al.  Microbiology of Root Canal Infections , 2016, Primary dental journal.

[6]  Michel Versluis,et al.  The effect of needle-insertion depth on the irrigant flow in the root canal: evaluation using an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  David Wayne Ronald Chubb,et al.  A review of the prognostic value of irrigation on root canal treatment success , 2019, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[8]  Hussain F. Al-Huwaizi,et al.  Cleaning Efficiency of Root Canal after Irrigation with New Irrigation Technique: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study , 2018 .

[9]  Ilaria Prada,et al.  Update of the therapeutic planning of irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal treatment. A literature review , 2019, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[10]  Taufan Bramantoro,et al.  Cleaning Efficacy of Root Canal Irrigation with Positive and Negative Pressure System , 2018, Iranian endodontic journal.

[11]  Li-na Niu,et al.  Effect of Canal Anastomosis on Periapical Fluid Pressure Build-up during Needle Irrigation in Single Roots with Double Canals using a Polycarbonate Model , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[12]  G S P Cheung,et al.  Influence of apical preparation size and irrigation technique on root canal debridement: a histological analysis of round and oval root canals. , 2019, International endodontic journal.

[13]  M Yilmaz,et al.  Effects of seven different irrigation techniques on debris and the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopy study , 2017, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[14]  C Boutsioukis,et al.  Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a Computational Fluid Dynamics study. , 2009, International endodontic journal.

[15]  Yuan Gao,et al.  Evaluation of the Effect of Needle Position on Irrigant Flow in the C-shaped Root Canal Using a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model. , 2015, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  Ozkan Adiguzel,et al.  Evaluation of the Effect of Needle Tilting Angle on Irrigant Flow in the Root Canal Using Side-Vented Needle by an Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics Model , 2016 .

[17]  Goodarz Ahmadi,et al.  Numerical and analytical investigation of irrigant penetration into dentinal microtubules , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[18]  Christos Boutsioukis,et al.  Uncontrolled Removal of Dentin during In Vitro Ultrasonic Irrigant Activation. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  C Boutsioukis,et al.  The effect of apical preparation size on irrigant flow in root canals evaluated using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[20]  Pranitha Kakarla,et al.  Comparative Analyses of Smear Layer Removal Using Four Different Irrigant Solutions in the Primary Root Canals - A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[21]  Y. Shen,et al.  Irrigation in endodontics , 2014, BDJ.

[22]  Carla Zogheib,et al.  Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals , 2019, Dentistry journal.

[23]  Jian Wang,et al.  Evaluation of needle movement effect on root canal irrigation using a computational fluid dynamics model , 2019, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[24]  Zoran Čarija,et al.  Irrigation of human prepared root canal – ex vivo based computational fluid dynamics analysis , 2012, Croatian medical journal.

[25]  J. Knowles,et al.  Investigations into in situ Enterococcus faecalis biofilm removal by passive and active sodium hypochlorite irrigation delivered into the lateral canal of a simulated root canal model , 2017, International endodontic journal.

[26]  Michel Versluis,et al.  Evaluation of irrigant flow in the root canal using different needle types by an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[27]  Zahed Mohammadi,et al.  Unusual Root Canal Irrigation Solutions. , 2017, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[28]  Franklin R Tay,et al.  Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents involving facial ecchymosis - a review. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[29]  L W M van der Sluis,et al.  Irrigant flow in the root canal: experimental validation of an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model using high-speed imaging. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[30]  A. Arias,et al.  Positive and negative pressure irrigation in oval root canals with apical ramifications: a computational fluid dynamics evaluation in micro-CT scanned real teeth. , 2019, International endodontic journal.

[31]  Michael Meinel,et al.  Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation. , 2020, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[32]  A A Neves,et al.  Impact of needle insertion depth on the removal of hard‐tissue debris , 2017, International endodontic journal.

[33]  Di Zhang,et al.  Numerical investigation of root canal irrigation adopting innovative needles with dimple and protrusion. , 2013, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[34]  Outi Swanljung,et al.  Root Canal Irrigants and Medicaments in Endodontic Malpractice Cases: A Nationwide Longitudinal Observation , 2018, Journal of endodontics.

[35]  Ying Ma,et al.  [Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the flow of four irrigations in root canal]. , 2015, Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology.

[36]  Yuan Gao,et al.  Three-dimensional numeric simulation of root canal irrigant flow with different irrigation needles. , 2010, Journal of Endodontics.

[37]  Nuno L. Alves,et al.  Computer fluid dynamics as a tool for analysis of endodontic irrigation , 2018 .

[38]  Markus Bussmann,et al.  Irrigation dynamics associated with positive pressure, apical negative pressure and passive ultrasonic irrigations: a computational fluid dynamics analysis. , 2014, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[39]  Jia Wang,et al.  [In vitro study of antimicrobial efficacy of different irrigations on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation in root canal]. , 2019, Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology.