Interpretation of machine-learning-based disruption models for plasma control

While machine learning techniques have been applied within the context of fusion for predicting plasma disruptions in tokamaks, they are typically interpreted with a simple 'yes/no' prediction or perhaps a probability forecast. These techniques take input signals, which could be real-time signals from machine diagnostics, to make a prediction of whether a transient event will occur. A major criticism of these methods is that, due to the nature of machine learning, there is no clear correlation between the input signals and the output prediction result. Here is proposed a simple method that could be applied to any existing prediction model to determine how sensitive the state of a plasma is at any given time with respect to the input signals. This is accomplished by computing the gradient of the decision function, which effectively identifies the quickest path away from a disruption as a function of the input signals and therefore could be used in a plasma control setting to avoid them. A numerical example is provided for illustration based on a support vector machine model, and the application to real data is left as an open opportunity.

[1]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Development of an efficient real-time disruption predictor from scratch on JET and implications for ITER , 2013 .

[2]  J. Vega,et al.  Adaptive high learning rate probabilistic disruption predictors from scratch for the next generation of tokamaks , 2014 .

[3]  Barbara Cannas,et al.  Improvements in disruption prediction at ASDEX Upgrade , 2015 .

[4]  Geert Verdoolaege,et al.  ELM Regime Classification by Conformal Prediction on an Information Manifold , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[5]  J. Vega,et al.  Results of the JET real-time disruption predictor in the ITER-like wall campaigns , 2012 .

[6]  F C Schuller,et al.  Disruptions in tokamaks , 1995 .

[7]  G. Zhuang,et al.  Prediction of density limit disruptions on the J-TEXT tokamak , 2016 .

[8]  B. Cannas,et al.  An adaptive real-time disruption predictor for ASDEX Upgrade , 2010 .

[9]  Alessandra Fanni,et al.  Disruption prediction with adaptive neural networks for ASDEX Upgrade , 2011 .

[10]  J. Vega,et al.  Disruption Prediction on JET during the ILW Experimental Campaigns , 2016 .

[11]  J. Manickam,et al.  Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions , 2007 .

[12]  G. Pautasso,et al.  Requirements for Triggering the ITER Disruption Mitigation System , 2016 .

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing , 2007 .

[14]  Michal Odstrcil,et al.  Comparison of Advanced Machine Learning Tools for Disruption Prediction and Disruption Studies , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.