Dominance, potential optimality and alternative ranking in imprecise multi-attribute decision making

In this paper, we introduce a methodology based on an additive multiattribute utility function that does not call for precise estimations of the inputs, such as utilities, attribute weights and performances of decision alternatives. The information about such inputs is assumed to be in the form of ranges, which constitute model constraints and give rise to nonlinear programming problems. This has significant drawbacks for outputting the sets of non-dominated and potentially optimal alternatives for such problems, and we, therefore, propose their transformation into equivalent linear programming problems. The set of non-dominated and potentially optimal alternatives is a non-ranked set and can be very large, which makes the choice of the most preferred alternative very difficult. The above problem is solved by proposing several methods for alternative ranking. An application to the disposal of surplus weapons-grade plutonium is considered, showing the advantages of this approach.

[1]  H. Moskowitz,et al.  Multiple-criteria robust interactive decision analysis (MCRID) for optimizing public policies , 1992 .

[2]  Sixto Ríos-Insua,et al.  Experiments in Robust Decision Making , 1994 .

[3]  Martin Weber,et al.  Utility function assessment on a micro-computer: An interactive procedure , 1988 .

[4]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Ranking with Partial Information: A Method and an Application , 1985, Oper. Res..

[5]  T. Stewart.  Robustness of Additive Value Function Methods in MCDM , 1996 .

[6]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Decision-aid for discrete multiple criteria decision making problems with imprecise data , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Phil Diamond,et al.  Fuzzy least squares , 1988, Inf. Sci..

[8]  P. Diamond,et al.  Extended fuzzy linear models and least squares estimates , 1997 .

[9]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Establishing Dominance in Multiattribute Decision Making Using an Ordered Metric Method , 1993 .

[10]  Antonio Jiménez-Martín,et al.  A decision support system for multiattribute utility evaluation based on imprecise assignments , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Stephen R. Watson,et al.  Structuring Multi-attribute Value Hierarchies , 1987 .

[12]  S Rios.  Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges , 1997 .

[13]  Gordon B. Hazen,et al.  Partial Information, Dominance, and Potential Optimality in Multiattribute Utility Theory , 1986, Oper. Res..

[14]  W. Cook,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data , 1991 .

[15]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Jacques L. Koko,et al.  The Art and Science of Negotiation , 2009 .

[17]  John C. Butler,et al.  A Multiattribute Utility Analysis of Alternatives for the Disposition of Surplus Weapons-Grade Plutonium , 1998, Oper. Res..

[18]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Dominance, potential optimality, imprecise information, and hierarchical structure in multi-criteria analysis , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  Z. Kmietowicz,et al.  Decision theory, linear partial information and statistical dominance , 1984 .

[20]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  Establishing strict dominance between alternatives with special type of incomplete information , 1997 .

[21]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  A model of multiattribute decisionmaking and trade-off weight determination under uncertainty , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[22]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Fuzzy regression analysis , 1992 .

[23]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  Tools for interactive multiattribute decisionmaking with incompletely identified information , 1997 .

[24]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements , 1992, Oper. Res..

[25]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  ARIADNE: A knowledge-based interactive system for planning and decision support , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[26]  A Mateos,et al.  Postoptimal analysis in a multi-attribute decision model for restoring contaminated aquatic ecosystems , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[27]  Shinhong Kim,et al.  An Extended Model for Establishing Dominance in Multiattribute Decisionmaking , 1996 .

[28]  John C. Butler,et al.  Evaluation of Alternatives for the Disposition of Surplus Weapons-usable Plutonium , 1998 .

[29]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information , 1997 .

[30]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  ELICITATION OF SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF DECISION-MAKING * , 1978 .

[31]  P. Fishburn.  Analysis of Decisions with Incomplete Knowledge of Probabilities , 1965 .

[32]  Carlo Bertoluzza,et al.  On a new class of distances between fuzzy numbers , 1995 .

[33]  Simon French,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN DISCRETE MULTI OBJECTIVE DECISION MAKING , 1991 .

[34]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Establishing dominance and potential optimality in multi-criteria analysis with imprecise weight and value , 2001, Comput. Oper. Res..

[35]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Interactive decision aiding for group decision support , 1995 .

[36]  K SarinR.  Interactive Evaluation and Bound Procedure for Selecting Multiattributed Alternatives , 1975 .

[37]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Obtaining Nondominated Priority Vectors for Multiple Objective Decisionmaking Problems with Different Combinations of Cardinal and Ordinal Information , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[38]  R. Słowiński.  Fuzzy sets in decision analysis, operations research and statistics , 1999 .

[39]  F. Fernández,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis with partial information about the weighting coefficients , 1995 .

[40]  Alfonso Mateos,et al.  MOIRA: A decision support system for decision making on aquatic ecosystems contaminated by radioactive fallout , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..