The role of learned societies in national scholarly publishing

This study examines the role of learned societies as publishers in Finland based on bibliographic information from two Finnish databases. We studied the share of learned societies' peer‐reviewed publication channels (serials with ISSNs and book publishers with distinct ISBN roots) and outputs (journal articles, conference articles, book articles, and monographs) in Finland. We also studied the share of learned societies' open access (OA) publications. In 2018, there were 402 peer‐reviewed publication channels in Finland. In 2011–2017, the number of peer‐reviewed publications from scholars working in Finnish universities and published in Finland was 17,724. Learned societies publish around 70% of these channels and publications, mostly in the fields of humanities and social sciences. Learned societies in Finland focus on journal publishing, whereas university presses and commercial publishers focus on book publishing. In 2016–2017, 38.4% of the learned societies' outputs were OA. This study concludes that Finnish learned societies play an integral part in national scholarly publishing. They play an especially important role in journal publishing, as commercial publishers produce only 2.6% of Finnish journals and book series, and only 1.4% of the journal articles from scholars working in Finnish universities.

[1]  Raquel Rego,et al.  What Roles for Scientific Associations in Contemporary Science? , 2014 .

[2]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  European databases and repositories for social sciences and humanities research output : report , 2017 .

[3]  Jyrki Ilva.  Towards Reliable Data - Counting the Finnish Open Access Publications , 2016, CRIS.

[4]  A. A. Manten,et al.  Scientific periodicals. Their historical development, characteristics and control , 1977 .

[5]  Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al.  A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Open access journal publishing in the Nordic countries , 2019, Learn. Publ..

[7]  Sally Morris.  What's so special about not‐for‐profit publishers? , 2001, Learn. Publ..

[8]  Jeffrey Brainard,et al.  Scientific societies worry about threat from Plan S. , 2019, Science.

[9]  S. Haustein,et al.  The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Wim van der Stelt,et al.  Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications.: Executive summary , 2014 .

[11]  H. Deda,et al.  Communication in science. , 2002, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[12]  Jyrki Ilva.  Looking for commitment: Finnish Open Access journals, infrastructure and funding , 2017 .

[13]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Reading practices in scholarly work: from articles and books to blogs , 2019, J. Documentation.

[14]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[15]  M. Jubb,et al.  Monitoring the transition to open access , 2017 .

[16]  Rob Johnson,et al.  On shifting sands: assessing the financial sustainability of UK learned societies , 2015, Learn. Publ..

[17]  Gunnar Sivertsen,et al.  Multilingüisme equilibrat en ciència , 2018 .

[18]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[19]  Concepción Rodríguez Parada.  BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació , 2001 .

[20]  D. McCarthy,et al.  Learned societies: a bridge between research, policy making and funding , 2013 .

[21]  James R. Hopkins.  The role of learned societies in knowledge exchange and dissemination: the case of the Regional Studies Association, 1965–2005 , 2011 .

[22]  Mark Ware,et al.  The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing fourth edition , 2015 .

[23]  Stuart Lawson,et al.  Untangling academic publishing: a history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research , 2017 .

[24]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles , 2018, PeerJ.

[25]  Tim C. E. Engels,et al.  Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: Findings from a European survey , 2018, Research Evaluation.

[26]  R. Dingwall,et al.  More than research intermediaries: a descriptive study of the impact and value of learned societies in the UK social sciences , 2017 .

[27]  ALEX CSISZAR.  How lives became lists and scientific papers became data: cataloguing authorship during the nineteenth century , 2017, The British Journal for the History of Science.

[28]  E. Love.  Scholarly Publishing , 2009, European Review.

[29]  R. Perrucci,et al.  From Little Science to Big Science , 2017 .

[30]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Evidence of Open Access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: a large-scale analysis , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[31]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[32]  Lisa A. Ennis.  The access principle: The case for open access to research and scholarship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Janne Pölönen.  Applications of, and Experiences with, the Norwegian Model in Finland , 2018, J. Data Inf. Sci..

[34]  Emanuel Kulczycki,et al.  Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries , 2018, Scientometrics.