Liberal arts writing and physics lab report writing in the context of kinematics thinking

Liberal arts writing are by definition sequential in that its appearance is manifested as successive paragraphs, while physics kinematics thinking involving the five variables of time, distance, initial velocity, final velocity and acceleration may be expressed in nonsequential diagrams that reflect spatial thinking. The non-sequential linkage concept among the variables in a diagram is straightforward, while the multiple linkages across the paragraphs in an essay are less obvious, especially to community college pre-engineering students studying kinematics. A pedagogy has been developed to emphasize the multi-linkages in liberal arts writing as it relates to kinematics thinking so as to improve physics lab report writing. The firstscore and postscore upon receiving writing improvement recommendations have been used to assess the pedagogy effectiveness in terms of correlation and relative gain. The assessment result suggests that the modeling of liberal arts writing in the context of diagrammatic kinematics thinking would help students to improve on their physics lab report writing and undergraduate research paper writing.

[1]  N. Holmes,et al.  Teaching critical thinking , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Pamela M. Seethaler,et al.  The role of cognitive processes, foundational math skill, and calculation accuracy and fluency in word-problem solving versus prealgebraic knowledge. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[3]  Andrzej Kulig,et al.  Quantifying origin and character of long-range correlations in narrative texts , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[4]  Mallory C. Stites,et al.  Time will tell: A longitudinal investigation of brain-behavior relationships during reading development. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Stasinos Stavrianeas,et al.  Adapting the Learning-Cycle to Enrich Undergraduate Neuroscience Education for All Students , 2008, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[6]  Katrina P. Jongman-Sereno,et al.  Cognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility , 2017, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[7]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Epigenetics and the evolution of instincts , 2017, Science.

[8]  H. Hurt,et al.  Socioeconomic (SES) differences in language are evident in female infants at 7months of age. , 2015, Early human development.

[9]  Llion Jones,et al.  Implicit Detection of Poetic Harmony by the Naïve Brain , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[10]  R. J. Hendel Effective Verbal Persuasion in Prayer, Business, and Teaching , 2016 .

[11]  Anne Fernald,et al.  SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. , 2013, Developmental science.

[12]  Wilbur Bergquist Role reversal: Laboratory before the lecture , 1991 .

[13]  Blair C. Armstrong,et al.  The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Daniel Maruyama,et al.  Parvalbumin-expressing interneurons coordinate hippocampal network dynamics required for memory consolidation , 2017, Nature Communications.

[15]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  The emotional arcs of stories are dominated by six basic shapes , 2016, EPJ Data Science.

[16]  Robert Karplus,et al.  Science teaching and the development of reasoning , 1977 .

[17]  Huijie Yang,et al.  Long-Range Correlations in Sentence Series from A Story of the Stone , 2016, PloS one.