Effector-dependent and response location learning of probabilistic sequences in serial reaction time tasks

We investigated the contributions of the sequences of effectors and response locations to probabilistic sequence learning in the serial reaction time task by means of bimanual transfer. Participants, trained with the dominant hand, were either required to maintain responding with the dominant hand after transfer or to switch to the nondominant hand. For both groups, half of the participants were transferred to the originally trained sequence, whereas the other half was transferred to a mirror-ordered sequence. This way, the sequence of effectors varied independently of the sequence of response locations. Sequence learning was assessed with probabilistic sequences, composed of either first-order or second-order probabilities. Transfer of sequence knowledge to the nondominant hand was equally good for the originally trained sequence as for the mirrored sequence. This suggests that probabilistic sequence learning can be based on either the sequence of effectors or response locations. However, when participants responded with the dominant hand to a mirrored sequence, transfer performance was disturbed. This indicates that changing both the sequences of effectors and response locations has a disruptive effect on the learning performance.

[1]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Attention and probabilistic sequence learning , 1998 .

[2]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning , 1996 .

[3]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Eric Soetens,et al.  Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures , 2006, Psychological research.

[5]  K. Doya,et al.  Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Which Attention Is Needed for Implicit Sequence Learning , 1999 .

[7]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task , 1997 .

[8]  Michael Ziessler,et al.  Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning , 1998 .

[9]  F Rösler,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  M. Ziessler,et al.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  E. Soetens,et al.  Sequence learning and sequential effects , 2004, Psychological research.

[13]  Eric Soetens,et al.  Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[14]  Benjamin A Clegg,et al.  Sequence learning , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Gilbert Remillard,et al.  Implicit learning of first-, second-, and third-order transition probabilities. , 2001 .

[16]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Implicit learning. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  A M Burton,et al.  Learning complex sequences: no role for observation? , 2001, Psychological research.

[18]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task , 1998 .

[19]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  章史 河村,et al.  Parallel neural networksに基づいたリハビリテーション介入 , 2007 .

[22]  G. Remillard.  Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Sequence Learning: Response Structure and Effector Transfer , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  P. Frensch,et al.  Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. , 1994 .

[25]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Alexander M. Harner,et al.  Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Peter A. Frensch,et al.  One concept, multiple meanings: On how to define the concept of implicit learning. , 1998 .

[29]  David A. Caulton,et al.  On the Modularity of Sequence Representation , 1995 .

[30]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  J. Danckert.  Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. , 1994 .

[33]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit sequence learning: The truth is in the details , 1998 .

[34]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[35]  G. Remillard,et al.  Implicit learning of first-, second-, and third-order transition probabilities. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  A. Kouzmin,et al.  IT Development: , 1966, Current History.

[37]  James H. Howard,et al.  Intermanual transfer of procedural learning after extended practice of probabilistic sequences , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  P. Frensch,et al.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[41]  H Heuer,et al.  Secondary-task effects on sequence learning , 1996, Psychological research.

[42]  Michael A. Stadler,et al.  Handbook of implicit learning , 1998 .