Supply coordination based on bonus policy in assembly under uncertain delivery time

The existing research of supply coordination under uncertain delivery time mainly focuses on the collaboration between the supplier and the manufacturer, which aim at minimizing the total cost of each side and finding comparative optimal solutions under decentralized decision. In the supply coordination, the collaboration between suppliers in assembly system is usually not considered. As a result, the manufacturer’s production is often delayed due to mismatching delivery of components between suppliers. Therefore, to ensure supply coordination in assembly system, collaboration between suppliers should be taken into consideration. In this paper, an assembly system with two suppliers and one manufacturer under uncertain delivery time is considered. The model is established and optimal solution is given under decentralized decision. Furthermore, the cost functions of two suppliers are both convex, and a unique Nash equilibrium exists between two suppliers. Then the optimal decision under supply coordination is analyzed, which is regarded as a benchmark for supply coordination. Additionally, the total cost of the assembly system is jointly convex in agreed delivery time. To achieve supply coordination a bonus policy is explored in the assembly system under uncertain delivery time, and the total cost under bonus policy must be lower than under decentralized decision. Finally the numerical and sensitivity analysis shows the cost of assembly system under bonus policy equals that under supply coordination, and the cost of each side in assembly system under bonus policy is lower compared to that under decentralized decision. The proposed research minimizes the total cost of each side with bonus policy in assembly system, ensures the supply coordination between suppliers and the manufacturer, and improves the competiveness of the whole supply chain.

[1]  David D. Yao,et al.  Order Fill Rate, Leadtime Variability, and Advance Demand Information in an Assemble-to-Order System , 2003, Oper. Res..

[2]  Kirstin Zimmer,et al.  Supply Chain Coordination with Uncertain Just-in-Time Delivery , 2002 .

[3]  Haresh Gurnani,et al.  A Bargaining Model for a First-Time Interaction Under Asymmetric Beliefs of Supply Reliability , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  Impact of Supply Learning When Suppliers Are Unreliable , 2009, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[5]  Zhu Dao-li Research on coordination contacts in supply chains with uncertainty of delivery lead-time , 2008 .

[6]  Y. Gerchak,et al.  Continuous Review Inventory Models Where Random Lead Time Depends on Lot Size and Reserved Capacity , 2000 .

[7]  Yingdong Lu,et al.  Order-Based Cost Optimization in Assemble-to-Order Systems , 2005, Oper. Res..

[8]  A. Dolgui,et al.  A model for supply planning under lead time uncertainty , 2002 .

[9]  George L. Nemhauser,et al.  Handbooks in operations research and management science , 1989 .

[10]  Kevin B. Hendricks,et al.  The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth , 2003 .

[11]  Yigal Gerchak,et al.  Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Jing-Sheng Song,et al.  Managing an Assemble-to-Order System with Returns , 2009, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[13]  Metin Çakanyildirim,et al.  Random lead times and expedited orders in (Q, r) inventory systems , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Jing-Sheng Song,et al.  Contract Assembly: Dealing with Combined Supply Lead Time and Demand Quantity Uncertainty , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[15]  Candace Aria Yano,et al.  Setting Planned Leadtimes in Serial Production Systems with Tardiness Costs , 1987 .

[16]  Guo Li Supply Coordination and Optimization Model of Assembly Supply Chain Based on Different Delivery Policies , 2011 .

[17]  Zhaolin Li,et al.  Managing a Single-Product Assemble-to-Order System with Technology Innovations , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Guo Li,et al.  Research Reviews and Future Prospective of Collaborative Operation in Supply Logistics Based on Supply-Hub , 2011 .

[19]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Chapter 6 Manufacturing lead times, order release and capacity loading , 1993, Logistics of Production and Inventory.

[20]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Note: A Separation Principle for a Class of Assemble-to-Order Systems with Expediting , 2007, Oper. Res..

[21]  Shichang Liu Force Analysis of Single Ring Spatial RSUR Mechanism Based on Screw Theory , 2011 .

[22]  Yimin Wang,et al.  On the Value of Mix Flexibility and Dual Sourcing in Unreliable Newsvendor Networks , 2005, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[23]  H. Gurnani Optimal lot-sizing policy with incentives for yield improvement , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing.

[24]  Vernon Ning Hsu,et al.  Optimal Component Stocking Policy for Assemble-to-Order Systems with Lead-Time-Dependent Component and Product Pricing , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Kevin B. Hendricks,et al.  Association Between Supply Chain Glitches and Operating Performance , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Li Jiang,et al.  Supplier Competition in Decentralized Assembly Systems with Price-Sensitive and Uncertain Demand , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[27]  J. Shanthikumar,et al.  Approximations for the time spent in a dynamic job shop with applications to due-date assignment , 1988 .

[28]  David D. Yao,et al.  Performance Analysis and Optimization of Assemble-to-Order Systems with Random Lead Times , 2002, Oper. Res..

[29]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long‐Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm , 2005 .

[30]  Wang Fu-shou Study on the Decision Mode of Supply Chain for Time-Sensitive and Price-Sensitive Demand , 2006 .

[31]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Asymptotically Optimal Control for an Assemble-to-Order System with Capacitated Component Production and Fixed Transport Costs , 2005 .