Micromotions and combined damages at the dental implant/bone interface

Micromotion and fretting damages at the dental implant/bone interface are neglected for the limitation of check methods, but it is particularly important for the initial success of osseointegration and the life time of dental implant. This review article describes the scientific documentation of micromotion and fretting damages on the dental implant/bone interface. The fretting amplitude is less than 30 µm in vitro and the damage in the interface is acceptable. While in vivo, the micromotion’s effect is the combination of damage in tissue level and the real biological reaction.

[1]  Minhao Zhu,et al.  Radial fretting behaviours of dental feldspathic ceramics against different counterbodies , 2005 .

[2]  H. Uhthoff,et al.  The Reversal of Tissue Differentiation Around Screws , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Observations on the Effect of Movement on Bone Ingrowth into Porous‐Surfaced Implants , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  P. Watson,et al.  A Histological Comparison in the Dog of Porous-coated vs. Threaded Dental Implants , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[5]  V. Ottani,et al.  Biological fixation of endosseous implants. , 2005, Micron.

[6]  L Ryd,et al.  Intermittent micromotion inhibits bone ingrowth. Titanium implants in rabbits. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[7]  H. Tsuru,et al.  The effects of early occlusal loading on one-stage titanium alloy implants in beagle dogs: a pilot study. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  J. Roberson.  Excessive metal release due to loosening and fretting of sintered particles on porous-coated hip prostheses. Report of two cases. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Niklaus P Lang,et al.  Critical review of immediate implant loading. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  P. Sadr-Eshkevari,et al.  Micromotion and stress distribution of immediate loaded implants: a finite element analysis. , 2009, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[11]  C. Bünger,et al.  Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite‐coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  S A Aquilino,et al.  Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  A G Patwardhan,et al.  Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation. , 1992, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegration of titanium implants. , 1986, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  P. Kapsa,et al.  An investigation of fretting behaviour of several metallic materials under grease lubrication , 2000 .

[16]  U. Joos,et al.  Mineralization at the interface of implants. , 2006, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[17]  Chun-Li Lin,et al.  Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method. , 2007, European journal of oral sciences.

[18]  H. Yang,et al.  Effect of ceramic conversion treatments on the surface damage and nickel ion release of NiTi alloys under fretting corrosion conditions , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[19]  Haiyang Yu.  RESEARCH ON FRETTING BEHAVIORS OF AXIAL CORTICAL BONE OF FEMUR , 2005 .

[20]  H. Tsuru,et al.  Initial bone-implant interfaces of submergible and supramergible endosseous single-crystal sapphire implants. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  Haiyang Yu,et al.  Investigation of micro-cracking behaviors of human femur cortical bone during radial fretting , 2011 .

[22]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. , 1973, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  M. Janal,et al.  The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[24]  Haiyang Yu,et al.  Comparison between radial fretting and dual-motion fretting features of cortical bone , 2010 .

[25]  Zhongrong Zhou,et al.  Fretting behavior of cortical bone against titanium and its alloy , 2005 .

[26]  Kristina J. Liu,et al.  Report of two cases , 1995 .

[27]  J B Brunski,et al.  Avoid pitfalls of overloading and micromotion of intraosseous implants. , 1993, Dental implantology update.

[28]  Zhou Zhongrong,et al.  An experimental study on radial fretting behaviour , 2001 .

[29]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Shanshan Gao,et al.  Dual-motion fretting behavior of mandibular cortical bone against pure titanium , 2009 .

[31]  P Nilsson,et al.  Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: an experimental in vivo study in the rat. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[32]  Po-Chun Chang,et al.  Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[33]  H. Yu,et al.  Radial Fretting Behavior of Cortical Bone Against Titanium , 2008 .