The effect of reactor design on the sustainability of grass biomethane

Grass biomethane is a sustainable transport biofuel. It can meet the 60% greenhouse gas saving requirements (as compared to the replaced fossil fuel) specified in the EU Renewable Energy Directive, if allowance is made for carbon sequestration, green electricity is used and the vehicle is optimized for gaseous biomethane. The issue in this paper is the effect of the digester type on the overall emissions savings. Examining three digestion configurations; dry continuous (DCAD), wet continuous (WCAD), and a two phase system (SLBR-UASB), it was found that the reactor type can result in a variation of 15% in emissions savings. The system that as modeled produced most biogas, and fuelled a vehicle most distance, the two phase system (SLBR-UASB), was the least sustainable due to biogas losses in the dry batch step. The system as modeled which produced the least biogas (DCAD) was the most sustainable as the parasitic demands on the system were least. Optimal reactor design for sustainability criteria should maximize biogas production, while minimizing biogas losses and parasitic demands.

[1]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  What is the energy balance of grass biomethane in Ireland and other temperate northern European climates , 2009 .

[2]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Is grass biomethane a sustainable transport biofuel? , 2010 .

[3]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Ethanol as an alternative fuel from agricultural, industrial and urban residues , 2007 .

[4]  Shiv Prasad,et al.  Ethanol Production from Sweet Sorghum Syrup for Utilization as Automotive Fuel in India , 2007 .

[5]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[6]  G. Lettinga,et al.  Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[7]  Jean-Marc Jossart,et al.  Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Gerard Kiely,et al.  CELTICFLUX: Measurement and Modelling of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes from Grasslands and a Peatland in Ireland , 2009 .

[9]  A Salter,et al.  Establishing an energy balance for crop-based digestion. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  Wilson Parawira,et al.  Anaerobic Treatment of Agricultural Residues and Wastewater - Application of High-Rate Reactors , 2004 .

[11]  Niamh M. Power,et al.  Which is the preferable transport fuel on a greenhouse gas basis; biomethane or ethanol? , 2009 .

[12]  S. Saggar,et al.  Partitioning and translocation of photosynthetically fixed 14C in grazed hill pastures , 1997, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[13]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and perspectives. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Niamh M. Power,et al.  An argument for using biomethane generated from grass as a biofuel in Ireland , 2009 .

[15]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  A biofuel strategy for Ireland with an emphasis on production of biomethane and minimization of land-take , 2010 .

[16]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[17]  M. Berglund,et al.  Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production , 2006 .

[18]  P. Weiland,et al.  Biomass Digestion in Agriculture: A Successful Pathway for the Energy Production and Waste Treatment in Germany , 2006 .

[19]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  Carbon sequestration in temperate grassland ecosystems and the influence of management, climate and elevated CO2 , 2004 .

[20]  Alastair J Ward,et al.  Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[21]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  Technical/economic/environmental analysis of biogas utilisation , 2004 .

[22]  G Perkoulidis,et al.  A multi-criteria ranking of different technologies for the anaerobic digestion for energy recovery of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[23]  A. Lehtomäki,et al.  Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion of Energy Crops: Methane Production, Nitrogen Mineralisation and Heavy Metal Mobilisation , 2006, Environmental technology.

[24]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  What type of digester configurations should be employed to produce biomethane from grass silage , 2010 .

[25]  J. Rintala,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of grass silage in batch leach bed processes for methane production. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[26]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Review of the integrated process for the production of grass biomethane. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  P. Lens,et al.  Anaerobic sludge granulation. , 2004, Water research.

[28]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions , 2006 .

[29]  Pete Smith,et al.  Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe , 2004 .

[30]  L Björnsson,et al.  Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two‐stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[31]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste , 2004 .