Explaining Chinese university students' continuance learning intention in the MOOC setting: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective

Abstract To gain more insight into the issue of high dropout rate in MOOC learning, this study aims at exploring the factors underlying the continuance intention to learn in the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) setting. By modifying and extending the Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM), the authors propose a research model that includes cognitive and affective variables, captures reflections of the past and expectations for the future and takes into account both intrinsic and extrinsic motives in the model construction to explain learners' intention to persist in learning a MOOC. The proposed model was tested with data from Chinese university students. The results show that the proposed model can explain 48% of continuance intention. The new variables (attitude and curiosity) added to the ECM were all found to be significant in explaining continuance intention. This study deepens our understanding of the development of learners' continuance intention in the MOOC setting in the following aspects: (a) although the personal trait, curiosity, was found to predict subsequent continuance intention, attitude played a considerably dominant role. In addition to respecting individual differences, practitioners can devise appropriate interventions to change attitudes and influence learners' retention in MOOCs; (b) the strong link between confirmation and both satisfaction and attitude suggests that MOOC instructors or designers must be prudent in advertising the courses to avoid exaggerating their benefits and the system's affordances.

[1]  Hyo-Jeong So,et al.  Examination of relationships among students' self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Abbot Packard,et al.  Improving Undergraduate Online Retention through Gated Advisement and Redundant Communication , 2008 .

[3]  Critical Enquiry.,et al.  Considerations when constructing a semantic differential scale. , 1996 .

[4]  Hangjung Zo,et al.  Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Youjae Yi A Critical review of consumer satisfaction , 1989 .

[6]  Min Peng,et al.  Social interaction in MOOCs: The mediating effects of immersive experience and psychological needs satisfaction , 2019, Telematics Informatics.

[7]  Xiaohui Chen,et al.  Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[9]  Daniel Burgos,et al.  The Development of MOOCs in China , 2017 .

[10]  Dorian A. Canelas,et al.  Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Jo Ellen Perry,et al.  Do Online Students Perform as Well as Lecture Students? , 2001 .

[12]  S. LaTour,et al.  Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Consumer Satisfaction Research , 1979 .

[13]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[14]  Jordan Litman Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information , 2005 .

[15]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[16]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  The Wick in the Candle of Learning , 2009, Psychological science.

[17]  Eusebio Scornavacca,et al.  The role of media dependency in predicting continuance intention to use ubiquitous media systems , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Jie Tang,et al.  Understanding Dropouts in MOOCs , 2019, AAAI.

[19]  R. Brislin Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[20]  George Siemens,et al.  What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[21]  K. Mardia Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications , 1970 .

[22]  Andrew M. Farrell,et al.  Insufficient Discriminant Validity: A Comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty and Shiu (2009) , 2008 .

[23]  Ling He,et al.  Effects of social-interactive engagement on the dropout ratio in online learning: insights from MOOC , 2018, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Rachel B. Baker,et al.  Persistence Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015 .

[26]  G. Loewenstein The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. , 1994 .

[27]  F. Adesoji Managing Students’ Attitude towards Science through Problem – Solving Instructional Strategy , 2008 .

[28]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis , 2008 .

[29]  Timothy Teo,et al.  The role of time in the acceptance of MOOCs among Chinese university students , 2019, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[30]  A. F. M. Ayub,et al.  The effects of perceived usefulness, confirmation and satisfaction on continuance intention in using massive open online course (MOOC) , 2019, Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal.

[31]  S. Reiss Multifaceted Nature of Intrinsic Motivation: The Theory of 16 Basic Desires , 2004 .

[32]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Discrepancy Theory Models of Satisfaction in IS Research , 2012 .

[33]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[35]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[36]  F. Fincham,et al.  Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities , 2004, Journal of personality assessment.

[37]  LiKun,et al.  Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience , 2017 .

[38]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[39]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[40]  R. Oliver A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[41]  Matthias J. Gruber,et al.  States of Curiosity Modulate Hippocampus-Dependent Learning via the Dopaminergic Circuit , 2014, Neuron.

[42]  Yair Levy,et al.  Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Katy Jordan,et al.  Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses , 2014 .

[44]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Yi Ding,et al.  Looking forward: The role of hope in information system continuance , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Gi Woong Choi,et al.  Understanding MOOC students: motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[47]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap , 2017 .

[48]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Looking forward, looking back: anticipation is more evocative than retrospection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  S. Hidi,et al.  Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes That Mediate Their Relationship. , 2002 .

[50]  Long Zhang,et al.  Task-technology Fit Aware Expectation-confirmation Model towards Understanding of MOOCs Continued Usage Intention , 2017, HICSS.

[51]  Heng Luo,et al.  Learning Profiles, Behaviors and Outcomes: Investigating International Students' Learning Experience in an English MOOC , 2018, 2018 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET).

[52]  D. Berlyne A theory of human curiosity. , 1954, British journal of psychology.

[53]  Miri Barak,et al.  Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants , 2018, Internet High. Educ..

[54]  M AlraimiKhaled,et al.  Understanding the MOOCs continuance , 2015 .

[55]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[56]  Sherif Halawa,et al.  Attrition and Achievement Gaps in Online Learning , 2015, L@S.

[57]  Ghada R. El Said,et al.  Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[58]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[59]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[60]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  To reward and beyond: Analyzing the effect of reward-based strategies in a MOOC , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[61]  Junjie Zhou Exploring the factors affecting learners’ continuance intention of MOOCs for online collaborative learning: An extended ECM perspective , 2017 .

[62]  Jordan Litman,et al.  Measuring Epistemic Curiosity and Its Diversive and Specific Components , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.

[63]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[64]  K. Hew,et al.  Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges , 2014 .

[65]  Wanli Xing,et al.  Dropout Prediction in MOOCs: Using Deep Learning for Personalized Intervention , 2019 .

[66]  Paul E. Spector Using self‐report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method , 1994 .

[67]  Mingming Zhou,et al.  Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[68]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Factors influencing the pursuit of personal learning goals in MOOCs , 2019, Distance Education.

[69]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[70]  ZhangL.,et al.  Understanding MOOC students , 2016 .

[71]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  S HoneKate,et al.  Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention , 2016 .

[73]  Winston Vaughan,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Learning on Achievement and Attitude Among Students of Color , 2002 .

[74]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[75]  Justin Reich,et al.  The MOOC pivot , 2019, Science.

[76]  Patrick Parslow,et al.  Dropout: MOOC participants’perspective , 2014 .