Single-trial EEG-informed fMRI reveals spatial dependency of BOLD signal on early and late IC-ERP amplitudes during face recognition

Simultaneous EEG-fMRI has opened up new avenues for improving the spatio-temporal resolution of functional brain studies. However, this method usually suffers from poor EEG quality, especially for evoked potentials (ERPs), due to specific artifacts. As such, the use of EEG-informed fMRI analysis in the context of cognitive studies has particularly focused on optimizing narrow ERP time windows of interest, which ignores the rich diverse temporal information of the EEG signal. Here, we propose to use simultaneous EEG-fMRI to investigate the neural cascade occurring during face recognition in 14 healthy volunteers by using the successive ERP peaks recorded during the cognitive part of this process. N170, N400 and P600 peaks, commonly associated with face recognition, were successfully and reproducibly identified for each trial and each subject by using a group independent component analysis (ICA). For the first time we use this group ICA to extract several independent components (IC) corresponding to the sequence of activation and used single-trial peaks as modulation parameters in a general linear model (GLM) of fMRI data. We obtained an occipital-temporal-frontal stream of BOLD signal modulation, in accordance with the three successive IC-ERPs providing an unprecedented spatio-temporal characterization of the whole cognitive process as defined by BOLD signal modulation. By using this approach, the pattern of EEG-informed BOLD modulation provided improved characterization of the network involved than the fMRI-only analysis or the source reconstruction of the three ERPs; the latter techniques showing only two regions in common localized in the occipital lobe.

[1]  Maarten De Vos,et al.  Let's face it, from trial to trial: Comparing procedures for N170 single-trial estimation , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Decoding visual consciousness from human brain signals , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Parametric Empirical Bayesian framework for fMRI‐constrained MEG/EEG source reconstruction , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[4]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Peter Fransson,et al.  Access to the Published Version May Require Journal Subscription. Published with Permission From: Elsevier Fmri Activity in the Medial Temporal Lobe during Famous Face Processing , 2022 .

[6]  G. Zouridakis,et al.  Single-trial evoked potential estimation: Comparison between independent component analysis and wavelet denoising , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  Vinh Thai Nguyen,et al.  The superior temporal sulcus and the N170 during face processing: Single trial analysis of concurrent EEG–fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  Zara M. Bergström,et al.  Multimodal imaging reveals the spatiotemporal dynamics of recollection , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  John Duncan,et al.  Absence of Face-specific Cortical Activity in the Complete Absence of Awareness: Converging Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potentials , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  How Does the Brain Discriminate Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces?: A PET Study of Face Categorical Perception , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  E I Olivares,et al.  Event-Related Potentials Elicited by the Explicit and Implicit Processing of Familiarity in Faces , 2010, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[14]  Thom F. Oostendorp,et al.  Towards a model-based integration of co-registered electroencephalography/functional magnetic resonance imaging data with realistic neural population meshes , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  A. Ishai,et al.  Year : 2008 Let ' s face it : it ' s a cortical , 2008 .

[17]  Tracy Warbrick,et al.  Scanning strategies for simultaneous EEG-fMRI evoked potential studies at 3 T. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  Hugo D. Critchley,et al.  Brain activity relating to the contingent negative variation: an fMRI investigation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Simultaneous EEG–fMRI reveals a temporal cascade of task-related and default-mode activations during a simple target detection task , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  The future of functional MRI in clinical medicine , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  Helmut Laufs,et al.  A personalized history of EEG–fMRI integration , 2012, NeuroImage.

[23]  Fumikazu Miwakeichi,et al.  Concurrent EEG/fMRI analysis by multiway Partial Least Squares , 2004, NeuroImage.

[24]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Spatio temporal dynamics of face recognition. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction , 1998, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. Eimer Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Andrew P. Bagshaw,et al.  Single trial variability of EEG and fMRI responses to visual stimuli , 2007, NeuroImage.

[28]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  EEGIFT: Group Independent Component Analysis for Event-Related EEG Data , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[29]  Jean Gotman,et al.  Metabolic correlates of epileptic spikes in cerebral cavernous angiomas , 2007, Epilepsy Research.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem , 2008, NeuroImage.

[31]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns , 2008, Science.

[33]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Electromagnetic source reconstruction for group studies , 2008, NeuroImage.

[35]  A. Engel,et al.  Single-trial EEG–fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  O Josephs,et al.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[37]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Let’s face it: It’s a cortical network , 2008, NeuroImage.

[38]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Neural Systems Underlying the Recognition of Familiar and Newly Learned Faces , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[40]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Validating neural correlates of familiarity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Attention to Detail: Why Considering Task Demands Is Essential for Single-Trial Analysis of BOLD Correlates of the Visual P1 and N1 , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  R. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Neural correlates of intentional and incidental recognition of famous faces. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  MEG and EEG data fusion: Simultaneous localisation of face-evoked responses , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[48]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  G. Yovel,et al.  Event‐related potential and functional MRI measures of face‐selectivity are highly correlated: A simultaneous ERP‐fMRI investigation , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[50]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects , 2004, Neuroreport.

[51]  F Cincotti,et al.  Integration of High Resolution EEG and Functional Magnetic Resonance in the Study of Human Movement-Related Potentials , 2000, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[52]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[53]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus , 2007, NeuroImage.

[54]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  René J. Huster,et al.  Methods for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An Introductory Review , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[57]  Hisao Nishijo,et al.  Generators of Visual Evoked Potentials for Faces and Eyes in the Human Brain as Determined by Dipole Localization , 2004, Brain Topography.

[58]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Face encoding and recognition in the human brain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  T. Shallice,et al.  Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  Egill Rostrup,et al.  Correlation between single‐trial visual evoked potentials and the blood oxygenation level dependent response in simultaneously recorded electroencephalography–functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[61]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation of Human Hippocampal Formation During Memory for Faces: A Pet Study , 1995, Cortex.

[62]  A. Engel,et al.  Trial-by-Trial Coupling of Concurrent Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identifies the Dynamics of Performance Monitoring , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  S Warach,et al.  Monitoring the patient's EEG during echo planar MRI. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[64]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  EEG-fMRI integration: a critical review of biophysical modeling and data analysis approaches. , 2010, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[65]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Fusing concurrent EEG–fMRI with dynamic causal modeling: Application to effective connectivity during face perception , 2014, NeuroImage.

[66]  David Poeppel,et al.  How can EEG/MEG and fMRI/PET data be combined? , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[67]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  Eduardo Martínez-Montes,et al.  EEG source imaging with spatio‐temporal tomographic nonnegative independent component analysis , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[69]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Spatially constrained ICA algorithm with an application in EEG processing , 2011, Signal Process..

[70]  M. Roth,et al.  Single‐trial analysis of oddball event‐related potentials in simultaneous EEG‐fMRI , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[71]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Comparison of Spike-Triggered Functional MRI BOLD Activation and EEG Dipole Model Localization , 2001, NeuroImage.

[72]  S. Makeig,et al.  Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[73]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Icasso: software for investigating the reliability of ICA estimates by clustering and visualization , 2003, 2003 IEEE XIII Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8718).

[74]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  The hippocampal region is involved in successful recognition of both remote and recent famous faces , 2004, NeuroImage.

[75]  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga,et al.  Uncovering the Mechanisms of Conscious Face Perception: A Single-Trial Study of the N170 Responses , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[76]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Canonical Source Reconstruction for MEG , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[77]  C. Price,et al.  Identification of famous faces and buildings: a functional neuroimaging study of semantically unique items. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[78]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Neuronal chronometry of target detection: Fusion of hemodynamic and event-related potential data , 2005, NeuroImage.