Split‐spectrum processing technique for SNR enhancement of ultrasonic guided wave

ABSTRACT Ultrasonic guided wave (UGW) systems are broadly used in several branches of industry where the structural integrity is of concern. In those systems, signal interpretation can often be challenging due to the multi‐modal and dispersive propagation of UGWs. This results in degradation of the signals in terms of signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and spatial resolution. This paper employs the split‐spectrum processing (SSP) technique in order to enhance the SNR and spatial resolution of UGW signals using the optimized filter bank parameters in real time scenario for pipe inspection. SSP technique has already been developed for other applications such as conventional ultrasonic testing for SNR enhancement. In this work, an investigation is provided to clarify the sensitivity of SSP performance to the filter bank parameter values for UGWs such as processing bandwidth, filter bandwidth, filter separation and a number of filters. As a result, the optimum values are estimated to significantly improve the SNR and spatial resolution of UGWs. The proposed method is synthetically and experimentally compared with conventional approaches employing different SSP recombination algorithms. The Polarity Thresholding (PT) and PT with Minimization (PTM) algorithms were found to be the best recombination algorithms. They substantially improved the SNR up to 36.9 dB and 38.9 dB respectively. The outcome of the work presented in this paper paves the way to enhance the reliability of UGW inspections.

[1]  J. Aussel Split-spectrum processing with finite impulse response filters of constant frequency-to-bandwidth ratio , 1990 .

[2]  Peter Mudge,et al.  Split-Spectrum Signal Processing for Reduction of the Effect of Dispersive Wave Modes in Long-range Ultrasonic Testing , 2015 .

[3]  P. S. Lowe,et al.  Investigation of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Interacting With Piezoelectric Transducers , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[4]  Tat-Hean Gan,et al.  Frequency-sweep examination for wave mode identification in multimodal ultrasonic guided wave signal , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[5]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  An Introduction to Ultrasonic Guided Waves , 2007 .

[6]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Ultrasonic Guided Waves in Structural Health Monitoring , 2004 .

[7]  Tat-Hean Gan,et al.  Coded Waveform Excitation for High-Resolution Ultrasonic Guided Wave Response , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[8]  M. Lowe,et al.  DISPERSE: A GENERAL PURPOSE PROGRAM FOR CREATING DISPERSION CURVES , 1997 .

[9]  Erdal Oruklu,et al.  System-on-chip design for ultrasonic target detection using split-spectrum processing and neural networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  M. G. Gustafsson Towards adaptive split spectrum processing , 1995, 1995 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium.

[11]  P.D. Wilcox,et al.  A rapid signal processing technique to remove the effect of dispersion from guided wave signals , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Alessandro Marzani,et al.  Localization of defects in irregular waveguides by dispersion compensation and pulse compression , 2013, Smart Structures.

[13]  Wamadeva Balachandran,et al.  Analysis of cross-correlation and wavelet de-noising for the reduction of the effects of dispersion in long-range ultrasonic testing , 2007 .

[14]  P. Wilcox,et al.  The effect of dispersion on long range inspection using ultrasonic guided waves , 2001 .

[15]  Kailiang Xu,et al.  Wideband dispersion reversal of lamb waves , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[16]  Tat-Hean Gan,et al.  Pulse-compression based iterative time-of-flight extraction of dispersed Ultrasonic Guided Waves , 2015, 2015 IEEE 13th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).

[17]  Luca De Marchi,et al.  A signal processing approach to exploit chirp excitation in Lamb wave defect detection and localization procedures , 2013 .

[18]  Guang Meng,et al.  A split spectrum processing of noise-contaminated wave signals for damage identification , 2012 .

[19]  Chengcheng Liu,et al.  Ultrasonic guided waves dispersion reversal for long bone thickness evaluation: A simulation study , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[20]  E. S. Furgason,et al.  Flaw-to-grain echo enhancement by split-spectrum processing , 1982 .

[21]  Gopika Syam,et al.  Flaw Detection using Split SpectrumTechnique , 2014 .

[22]  P.M. Shankar,et al.  Split-spectrum processing: analysis of polarity threshold algorithm for improvement of signal-to-noise ratio and detectability in ultrasonic signals , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  T. Hayashi,et al.  Pulse Compression Technique Considering Velocity Dispersion of Guided Wave , 2008 .

[24]  D. Zellouf,et al.  A numerical dispersion compensation technique for time recompression of Lamb wave signals. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[25]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Split spectrum processing: optimizing the processing parameters using minimization , 1987 .

[26]  Harold R. Ward,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Sea Clutter Decorrelation with Frequency Agility , 1968, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[27]  Jing Lin,et al.  Chirp-based dispersion pre-compensation for high resolution Lamb wave inspection , 2014 .

[28]  R. Miralles,et al.  New analysis and extensions of split-spectrum processing algorithms , 2012 .

[29]  Weiqi Wang,et al.  Mode separation of Lamb waves based on dispersion compensation method. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Cristinel Mares,et al.  Time-Frequency Analysis of Long Range Ultrasonic Signals , 2012 .