Biometric fusion: Does modeling correlation really matter?

Sources of information in a multibiometric system are often assumed to be statistically independent in order to simplify the design of the fusion algorithm. However, the independence assumption may not be always valid. In this paper, we analyze whether modeling the dependence between match scores in a multibiometric system has any effect on the fusion performance. Our analysis is based on the likelihood ratio (LR) based fusion framework, which guarantees optimal performance if the match score densities are known. We show that the assumption of independence between matchers has a significant negative impact on the performance of the LR fusion scheme only when (i) the dependence characteristics among genuine match scores is different from that of the impostor scores and (ii) the individual matchers are not very accurate.

[1]  László Györfi,et al.  A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition , 1996, Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability.

[2]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  Impact of feature correlations on separation between bivariate normal distributions , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Arun Ross,et al.  Handbook of Multibiometrics , 2006, The Kluwer international series on biometrics.

[4]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Decision-Level Fusion in Fingerprint Verification , 2001, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[5]  Thierry Pun,et al.  Analysis of multimodal binary detection systems based on dependent/independent modalities , 2007, 2007 IEEE 9th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.

[6]  Matthew P. Wand,et al.  Kernel Smoothing , 1995 .

[7]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Is independence good for combining classifiers? , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[8]  J. Copas,et al.  Interpreting Kullback-Leibler divergence with the Neyman-Pearson lemma , 2006 .

[9]  C. D. Kemp,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[10]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  A parametric copula based framework for multimodal signal processing , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[11]  Q. Vuong Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[12]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Database, protocols and tools for evaluating score-level fusion algorithms in biometric authentication , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  FVC2002: Second Fingerprint Verification Competition , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[14]  Oleg Ushmaev,et al.  Biometric Fusion : Robust Approach , 2006 .

[15]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Finite Mixture Models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  E. Lehmann Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 1960 .

[17]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  A Principled Approach to Score Level Fusion in Multimodal Biometric Systems , 2005, AVBPA.