Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions

Performing online complementary motor adjustments is quintessential to joint actions since it allows interacting people to coordinate efficiently and achieve a common goal. We sought to determine whether, during dyadic interactions, signaling strategies and simulative processes are differentially implemented on the basis of the interactional role played by each partner. To this aim, we recorded the kinematics of the right hand of pairs of individuals who were asked to grasp as synchronously as possible a bottle-shaped object according to an imitative or complementary action schedule. Task requirements implied an asymmetric role assignment so that participants performed the task acting either as (1) Leader (i.e., receiving auditory information regarding the goal of the task with indications about where to grasp the object) or (2) Follower (i.e., receiving instructions to coordinate their movements with their partner’s by performing imitative or complementary actions). Results showed that, when acting as Leader, participants used signaling strategies to enhance the predictability of their movements. In particular, they selectively emphasized kinematic parameters and reduced movement variability to provide the partner with implicit cues regarding the action to be jointly performed. Thus, Leaders make their movements more “communicative” even when not explicitly instructed to do so. Moreover, only when acting in the role of Follower did participants tend to imitate the Leader, even in complementary actions where imitation is detrimental to joint performance. Our results show that mimicking and signaling are implemented in joint actions according to the interactional role of the agent, which in turn is reflected in the kinematics of each partner.

[1]  R. Nebes,et al.  Patterns of Hand Preference in a Student Population , 1975, Cortex.

[2]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[3]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[4]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Speaking in time , 2002, Speech Commun..

[7]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[9]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  An Interference Effect of Observed Biological Movement on Action , 2003, Current Biology.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Rick Grush,et al.  The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[16]  W. Prinz,et al.  How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M. Arbib From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  M. Candidi,et al.  Mapping Implied Body Actions in the Human Motor System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Sensorimotor Learning Configures the Human Mirror System , 2007, Current Biology.

[22]  U. Castiello,et al.  Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour , 2007, Cognition.

[23]  H. Bekkering,et al.  The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Is it really my turn? An event-related fMRI study of task sharing , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[25]  B. Repp,et al.  Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[26]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Wen-Jui Kuo,et al.  Action Co-representation is Tuned to Other Humans , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Social Neuroscience Action Co-representation: the Joint Snarc Effect Action Co-representation: the Joint Snarc Effect , 2022 .

[29]  U. Castiello,et al.  Both your intention and mine are reflected in the kinematics of my reach-to-grasp movement , 2008, Cognition.

[30]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  U. Castiello,et al.  The case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: A kinematic study on social intention , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[32]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Understanding the flexibility of action–perception coupling , 2009, Psychological research.

[33]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Acting together in and beyond the mirror neuron system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[34]  James Stanley,et al.  Using predictive motor control processes in a cognitive task: behavioral and neuroanatomical perspectives. , 2009, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[35]  U. Castiello,et al.  Does the intention to communicate affect action kinematics? , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[36]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Joint Action, Interactive Alignment, and Dialog , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[37]  Caroline Catmur,et al.  Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  Experimental Semiotics: A New Approach for Studying Communication as a Form of Joint Action , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Ada Kritikos,et al.  Placing actions in context: motor facilitation following observation of identical and non-identical manual acts , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Susan Brennan,et al.  Partner-Specific Adaptation in Dialog , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[41]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[42]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Granger Causality Mapping during Joint Actions Reveals Evidence for Forward Models That Could Overcome Sensory-Motor Delays , 2010, PloS one.

[43]  C. Frith,et al.  Follow you, Follow me: Continuous Mutual Prediction and Adaptation in Joint Tapping , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[45]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  A minimal architecture for joint action , 2010, Neural Networks.

[46]  U. Alon,et al.  The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Robrecht P R D van der Wel,et al.  Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Giovanni Pezzulo,et al.  What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interaction problems , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data , 2011 .

[53]  Gabriele K. Lünser,et al.  Automatic imitation in a strategic context: players of rock–paper–scissors imitate opponents' gestures† , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Paula Fitzpatrick,et al.  Understanding social motor coordination. , 2011, Human movement science.

[55]  G. Csibra,et al.  Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Toward a neural basis of interactive alignment in conversation , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  M. Candidi,et al.  And Yet They Act Together: Interpersonal Perception Modulates Visuo-Motor Interference and Mutual Adjustments during a Joint-Grasping Task , 2012, PloS one.

[58]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  When emulation becomes reciprocity. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[59]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[60]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  G. Pezzulo,et al.  Action simulation in the human brain: Twelve questions , 2013 .

[62]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  Somatotopic mapping of piano fingering errors in sensorimotor experts: TMS studies in pianists and visually trained musically naives. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.