Auditory orientation in crickets: Pattern recognition controls reactive steering

Many groups of insects are specialists in exploiting sensory cues to locate food resources or conspecifics. To achieve orientation, bees and ants analyze the polarization pattern of the sky, male moths orient along the females' odor plume, and cicadas, grasshoppers, and crickets use acoustic signals to locate singing conspecifics. In comparison with olfactory and visual orientation, where learning is involved, auditory processing underlying orientation in insects appears to be more hardwired and genetically determined. In each of these examples, however, orientation requires a recognition process identifying the crucial sensory pattern to interact with a localization process directing the animal's locomotor activity. Here, we characterize this interaction. Using a sensitive trackball system, we show that, during cricket auditory behavior, the recognition process that is tuned toward the species-specific song pattern controls the amplitude of auditory evoked steering responses. Females perform small reactive steering movements toward any sound patterns. Hearing the male's calling song increases the gain of auditory steering within 2–5 s, and the animals even steer toward nonattractive sound patterns inserted into the speciesspecific pattern. This gain control mechanism in the auditory-to-motor pathway allows crickets to pursue species-specific sound patterns temporarily corrupted by environmental factors and may reflect the organization of recognition and localization networks in insects.

[1]  Hoy Rr,et al.  Acoustic communication in crickets: a model system for the study of feature detection. , 1978 .

[2]  R. Menzel,et al.  Honey bees navigate according to a map-like spatial memory. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Hoy,et al.  Initiation of behavior by single neurons: the role of behavioral context. , 1984, Science.

[4]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  How do insects use path integration for their navigation? , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  G. Pollack,et al.  Temporal Pattern as a Cue for Species-Specific Calling Song Recognition in Crickets , 1979, Science.

[6]  John A. Doherty,et al.  Phonotaxis in the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer: comparisons of choice and no-choice paradigms , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  R. Robertson,et al.  Neuronal Circuits: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1986, Science.

[8]  G. Pollack,et al.  Phonotaxis in flying crickets: Neural correlates , 1981 .

[9]  J R Riley,et al.  The automatic pilot of honeybees , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  B Hedwig,et al.  Mechanisms underlying phonotactic steering in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus revealed with a fast trackball system , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[12]  William E. Wagner Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  E. Staudacher Sensory responses of descending brain neurons in the walking cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  J. Fullard,et al.  The evolutionary biology of insect hearing. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  G. Pollack,et al.  Who, what, where? recognition and localization of acoustic signals by insects , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  John Thorson,et al.  Auditory behavior of the cricket , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[17]  Andrew C. Mason,et al.  Hyperacute directional hearing in a microscale auditory system , 2001, Nature.

[18]  R. Wehner ‘Matched filters’ — neural models of the external world , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  K. Schildberger,et al.  Temporal selectivity of identified auditory neurons in the cricket brain , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  Hans Scharstein,et al.  Cricket phonotaxis: localization depends on recognition of the calling song pattern , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  D. Blumstein Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[22]  M. Lehrer Orientation and Communication in Arthropods , 1997, EXS.

[23]  R. Menzel,et al.  Cognitive architecture of a mini-brain: the honeybee , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  M. Hörner,et al.  The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  Berthold Hedwig,et al.  Complex auditory behaviour emerges from simple reactive steering , 2004, Nature.

[26]  D. von Helversen,et al.  Acoustic pattern recognition and orientation in orthopteran insects: parallel or serial processing? , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[27]  M. Hörner,et al.  The function of auditory neurons in cricket phonotaxis , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[28]  R. Wehner Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  Franz Huber,et al.  Cricket behavior and neurobiology , 1989 .

[30]  J. Doherty Song recognition and localization in the phonotaxis behavior of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[31]  R. M. Hennig Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets? , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.