Optimized group communication for tactical military networks

In tactical networks there is a need for group communication applications, such as position and information sharing (Situational Awareness data), and Push-to-Talk (PTT) voice communication. This paper focuses on group communication in tactical military ad hoc networks, where most of the nodes are interested receivers. In this case, an efficient flooding protocol will be the best solution for the group communication. Efficient flooding can be achieved with the Simplified Multicast Forwarding (SMF) framework. The performance of SMF depends on the chosen forwarding algorithm. Two plausible alternatives are S-MPR and NS-MPR. The former is the more bandwidth efficient, while the latter is more robust to mobility. This paper investigates the limitations of the forwarding algorithms and investigates measures to mend S-MPR's mobility problem. Further, the paper suggests combining S-MPR and NS-MPR using the radio load as metric. Finally, the PTT and Situational Awareness (SA) traffic types are evaluated when run simultaneously, and a preemptive switch to S-MPR is proposed for the SA traffic. Through employing the methods suggested in this paper, the performance for PTT and SA traffic forwarded using SMF in tactical military networks can be increased.

[1]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Performance analysis of olsr multipoint relay flooding in two ad hoc wireless network models , 2001 .

[2]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  The Broadcast Storm Problem in a Mobile Ad Hoc Network , 1999, Wirel. Networks.

[3]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Simplified Multicast Forwarding , 2012, RFC.

[4]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Evaluation of distributed cover set algorithms in mobile ad hoc network for simplified multicast forwarding , 2007, MOCO.

[5]  D. J. Rahikka,et al.  Interoperable secure voice communications in tactical systems , 2000 .

[6]  Jie Wu,et al.  Performance analysis of broadcast protocols in ad hoc networks based on self-pruning , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[7]  Nathalie Mitton,et al.  An analysis of the Multi-Point Relays selection in OLSR , 2005 .

[8]  Paal E. Engelstad,et al.  Preemption mechanisms for push-to-talk in ad hoc networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE 34th Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[9]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) , 2003, RFC.

[10]  Shigeo Shioda,et al.  An efficient network-wide broadcasting based on hop-limited shortest-path trees , 2008, Comput. Networks.

[11]  A. M. Abdullah,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1997 .

[12]  M. Benzaid,et al.  Analysis and simulation of fast-OLSR , 2003, The 57th IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Spring..

[13]  Thomas Kunz,et al.  Adaptive MANET Routing: A Case Study , 2008, ADHOC-NOW.

[14]  Thomas Kunz,et al.  Mobility Metrics to Enable Adaptive Routing in MANET , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications.

[15]  Cédric Adjih,et al.  Optimized multicast based on multipoint relaying , 2005, First International Conference on Wireless Internet (WICON'05).