Measuring optical freeform surfaces using a coupled reference data method

Flat optical freeform surfaces usually possess non-rotational symmetry with a small curvature and lack of strong features for surface alignment. Due to the lack of strong features and small curvature, it is difficult to align the design and measured surfaces for characterizing the surface quality of flat optical freeform surfaces with sub-micrometre form accuracy. The traditional least squares method (LSM) generally produces large errors as there is a lack of strong features as reference for the alignment of the design and measured surfaces. This paper proposes a novel and practical method named the coupled reference data method (CRDM) to evaluate flat optical freeform surfaces with high efficiency and precision in the nanometre scale. The method couples reference data to the workpiece of the freeform surface designed model and the concerning reference features are machined together with the workpiece. By aligning the reference data, the proposed CRDM carries out fast surface matching. This makes good preparation for the next matching optimization which is conducted by the least-squares and minimax zone method. After the precise surface matching, the flat optical freeform surface can be evaluated by 3D form error topography and parameters. As compared with a traditional freeform measurement method such as LSM, it is interesting to note that the accuracy and the stability of the measurement can be significantly enhanced by the CRDM.

[1]  Weidong Zhu,et al.  Feature-based reverse modeling strategies , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  H. Yau,et al.  Reverse engineering of complex geometry using rational B-splines , 1997 .

[3]  Hiroto Suzuki,et al.  Shape error evaluation method of free-form surfaces , 1999, Comput. Aided Des..

[4]  Yonghua Chen,et al.  A reverse engineering method based on haptic volume removing , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  Suet To,et al.  An integrated form characterization method for measuring ultra-precision freeform surfaces , 2007 .

[6]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  Interpretation of errors from inspection results , 1994 .

[7]  Peihua Gu,et al.  Localization and comparison of two free-form surfaces , 1996, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  Tibor Steiner,et al.  Reconstruction of piecewise planar objects from point clouds , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[9]  Ralph R. Martin,et al.  Reverse engineering of geometric models - an introduction , 1997, Comput. Aided Des..

[10]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Decomposing the problem of constrained surface fitting in reverse engineering , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[11]  Yadong Li,et al.  Inspection of free-form shaped parts , 2005 .

[12]  Colin Bradley,et al.  G1 continuity of B-spline surface patches in reverse engineering , 1995, Comput. Aided Des..

[13]  Matthew Ming Fai Yuen,et al.  Feature-based reverse engineering of mannequin for garment design , 1999, Comput. Aided Des..

[14]  Chi Fai Cheung,et al.  Theoretical and experimental evaluation of surface quality for optical freeform surfaces , 2006 .

[15]  Weidong Zhu,et al.  Constrained fitting for 2D profile-based reverse modeling , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[16]  Sandy To,et al.  Measuring ultra-precision freeform surfaces using a robust form characterization method , 2006 .

[17]  Yan Li,et al.  A practical evaluation approach towards form deviation for two-dimensional contours based on coordinate measurement data , 2000 .

[18]  Harvey M. Pollicove,et al.  Advanced manufacturing generates conformal optics : Optoelectronics world : Optics , 1999 .

[19]  Yunfeng Zhang,et al.  Cloud data modelling employing a unified, non-redundant triangular mesh , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..