Comparative Evaluation of Three Phenotypic Tests—Carba NP, Modified Carba NP and Rapidec Carba NP Test for Rapid Detection of Carbapenem Resistance in Blood Culture Isolates of Escherichia coli in an ICU Setting

Background To determine the antibiotic resistance pattern, the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenem resistance in blood culture isolates of E. coli. Further, we evaluated and compared Carba NP, Modified Carba NP and a kit-based Rapidec Carba NP test to detect carbapenem resistance rapidly. Methods Twenty-six carbapenem-resistant strains and four susceptible strains were selected. The three methods mentioned above were evaluated as per Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). These tests are based on biochemical detection of the hydrolysis of the beta-lactam ring of a carbapenem-imipenem, followed by the colour change of a pH indicator. Results Carba NP test was positive in 24 out of 26 isolates; the Modified Carba NP and Rapidec Carba NP tests were positive for all the isolates (26/26). All the carbapenemase non-producers (100%, 04/04) were negative. Conclusion Modified Carba NP is a more effortless and inexpensive alternative to the Carba NP test, allowing the detection of carbapenemase activity directly from bacterial cultures of Enterobacteriaceae. The test could be used in low-income countries with large reservoirs for carbapenemase producers and can be implemented in any laboratory worldwide.